Your search

In authors or contributors
  • Background: Postoperative fibrosis is a common and significant complication following liposuction for lipedema, often leading to tissue induration, pain, and compromised aesthetic results. This fibrosis can jeopardize the overall success of the procedure by reducing skin elasticity and altering the intended body contour.Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of early shockwave therapy (SWT) initiated 1 week after surgery to reduce postoperative fibrosis and preserve the functional and aesthetic outcomes of liposuction in lipedema patients. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 50 female patients with stage II–III lipedema who underwent power-assisted liposuction (PAL). Patients received SWT sessions three times per week for 3 weeks, starting 7 days postoperatively. Outcomes were compared to a control group of 25 patients who did not receive SWT. Primary endpoints included fibrosis severity assessed by ultrasound elastography, skin elasticity measurements, and patient-reported outcomes on pain and satisfaction. The SWT group exhibited a significant reduction in fibrosis (2.1 ± 0.3 vs 3.8 ± 0.5, p < .001), improved skin elasticity (1.5 ± 0.2 mm vs 1.0 ± 0.3 mm, p < .01), and lower pain scores (2.3 ± 0.8 vs 4.7 ± 1.2, p < .001) compared to the control group. Results: Patient satisfaction was also higher in the SWT group (92% vs 68%, p < .01). Conclusion: Early postoperative shockwave therapy is an effective and safe treatment to reduce fibrosis after liposuction for lipedema. By modulating fibroblast activity, reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, and improving tissue perfusion, SWT preserves the surgical outcomes and enhances patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that integrating SWT into postoperative protocols could be a valuable strategy to optimize liposuction results in lipedema patients.

  • BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic disorder of adipose tissue that predominantly affects women and is frequently misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. Traditionally associated with the lower extremities, lipedema can also involve the abdominal region, although there are currently no established diagnostic criteria for abdominal lipedema. This study aims to propose a diagnostic algorithm for abdominal lipedema based on clinical features, macroscopic observations, and ultrasound findings. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 327 patients treated between March 2018 and March 2024 for lipedema, including those with abdominal involvement. Clinical evaluations, ultrasound imaging, and surgical outcomes were examined to assess the prevalence and characteristics of abdominal lipedema. Patients were classified based on lipedema severity, and criteria for abdominal lipedema diagnosis were established through clinical and imaging data. RESULTS: The study identified that abdominal involvement increases with the severity of lipedema, with 31% of patients with stage II lipedema and 70% of those with stage III lipedema exhibiting abdominal manifestations. The proposed diagnostic algorithm includes maximum, major, and minor criteria, such as symmetrical fat deposition, pain, and non-responsiveness to diet and exercise. Specific threshold values for each category were defined to establish the diagnosis. The findings highlight the existence of both ascending (from legs to abdomen) and descending (from arms to abdomen) centripetal progression patterns, challenging traditional notions that limit lipedema to the extremities CONCLUSION: Abdominal lipedema is a significant and underrecognized manifestation of the condition, requiring specific diagnostic criteria to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The study proposes a diagnostic framework based on clinical and imaging features that can improve the recognition and management of abdominal lipedema. Multidisciplinary treatment approaches, including both conservative measures and surgical interventions such as abdominoplasty and liposuction, are recommended to improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

  • BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by abnormal fat accumulation, pain, often necessitating surgical intervention. While liposuction is the primary treatment to remove pathological fat, postoperative skin laxity poses a significant challenge, particularly in advanced stages. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the efficacy of helium plasma technology as an adjunct to liposuction of the lower limbs across the three clinical stages of lipedema, with a focus on its impact on skin tone, elasticity, and the necessity for dermolipectomy. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 90 female patients with lower limbs lipedema, divided equally across Stages I, II, and III. Helium plasma technology was applied post-liposuction to enhance skin tightening. Outcomes included postoperative skin elasticity, dermolipectomy incidence, and patient satisfaction RESULTS: In Stage I, skin tone and elasticity increased by 25%, though the already low need for dermolipectomy remained largely unchanged. In Stage II, skin elasticity improved by 40%, reducing the incidence of dermolipectomy from 30 to 10%. In Stage III, while the need for dermolipectomy was unaffected, helium plasma contributed to improved skin elasticity and patient satisfaction. No major adverse events were reported. This study is limited by the absence of a randomized control group and the lack of blinding in outcome assessments, which may introduce observer bias. These factors should be considered when interpreting the results and highlight the need for future controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: Helium plasma technology offers stage-specific benefits in liposuction for lipedema of the lower limbs. It enhances skin tone and elasticity in early stages, reduces dermolipectomy requirements in intermediate stages, and improves skin quality in advanced stages when combined with dermolipectomy. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize protocols for clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Last update from database: 11/21/25, 8:49 AM (UTC)

Explore

Resource type

Online resource