Your search
Results 2 resources
-
BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a prevalent chronic condition in women, characterized by a painful and symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue primarily in the lower limbs. Its diagnosis is based on specific clinical characteristics; however, these characteristics lack robust scientific validation. Furthermore, lipedema is frequently misdiagnosed as obesity. This study aims to compare quality of life and physical and psychological characteristics between patients with obesity with and without lipedema. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 30 patients with obesity and lipedema (Lip-Obes group) and 29 patients with only obesity (nonLip-Obes group). Quality of life, body composition (BMI, fat free mass, fat mass, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, leg volume), pain (pain pattern, pressure pain thresholds, pain interference, pain distribution, symptoms of neuropathic pain), physical functioning (hand grip strength, quadriceps strength, functional exercise capacity, functional mobility and physical activity level), and psychosocial functioning (pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety, and stress, body image dissatisfaction, self-efficacy, and eating difficulties) were assessed using clinical measurements and self-reported outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Compared to the nonLip-Obes group, the Lip-Obes group showed greater impairments in quality of life (p < 0.05). Despite similar body composition variables, the Lip-Obes group had lower waist-to-hip, waist-to-height, upper leg-to-waist, and lower leg-to-waist ratios, as well as higher total limb volume than the nonLip-Obes group. Additionally, the Lip-Obes group reported higher pain intensity, lower pressure pain thresholds in the arms and legs, and greater pain interference than the nonLip-Obes group (p < 0.05). Although hand-grip strength and physical activity levels were comparable, the Lip-Obes group exhibited lower quadriceps strength, functional exercise capacity, and functional mobility (p < 0.05). Additionally, the Lip-Obes group reported higher pain catastrophizing, greater body image dissatisfaction, and more severe eating difficulties than the nonLip-Obes group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in depression, anxiety, stress, or self-efficacy between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional study highlights the complex nature of lipedema, providing preliminary evidence of differences in quality of life and distinct body composition and physical and physiological characteristics between patients with obesity with and without lipedema. These results emphasize the need for further research to identify diagnostic biomarkers for lipedema through in-depth investigations. Future studies should also focus on developing and optimizing a multidisciplinary treatment approach tailored to the unique characteristics of patients with lipedema.
-
RATIONALE: To evaluate which factors are associated with change in lymphedema-specific quality of life (QoL) and relative volume difference in the maintenance phase after a multidisciplinary intensive treatment program in patients with lower limb lymphedema(LLL). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, patients received a multidisciplinary intensive treatment followed by a maintenance phase. In this maintenance phase, patients were advised to perform skin care and exercises and to wear compression garments. Circumferential measurements and the Lymph-ICF-LL questionnaires to determine volume and the lymphedema-specific QoL, respectively, were collected at the start and end of the intensive treatment and at 6 months follow-up. Patient-, lymphedema-, and treatment-related variables were collected to investigate their association with change in lymphedema-specific QoL and relative volume in the maintenance phase. Mann-Whitney U and Spearman rank correlation tests were applied. Patients (n = 279) who did not receive physiotherapy between 5 and 6 months follow-up and had a lower %score on the 6-minute walk test at the start of the intensive treatment showed significant better improvement in physical function and general tasks/household in the maintenance phase, respectively. Younger age, concomitant lipedema, and a lower % volume reduction during intensive treatment were significantly associated with less relative volume increase in the maintenance phase. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without physiotherapy around 5-6 months follow-up or with limited physical capacity at the start may perceive better improvements in certain lymphedema-specific QoL domains, while younger age, concomitant lipedema, and less initial volume reduction appear to be less predisposed to volume regain during the maintenance phase.
Explore
Topic
Resource type
- Journal Article (2)
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(2)
-
Between 2020 and 2026
(2)
- 2026 (2)
-
Between 2020 and 2026
(2)
Online resource
- no (2)