Your search

Modern aspects of pathophysiology, epidemiology, symptoms, diagnosis and therapy in lipedema are presented. Within recent years the development of new techniques in local anaesthesia and surgery has revolutionized therapy. By using surgical and conservative methods (tumescent liposuction and combined decongestive therapy) a normalization of body proportions and a reduction of subjective and objective symptoms with a distinct improvement in the quality of life can be achieved.

Combined decongestive therapy (CDT) in lipedema can only reduce edema, not the fat components; therefore only a portion of the symptoms can be treated. In contrast liposuction is able to reduce the increased volume of fatty tissue; it also decreases the tendency to develop edema. Only by combining conservative and surgical therapy regimens optimal results can be achieved. From the theoretical and practical point of view nowadays in lipedema grade I, II and partially grade III conservative treatment alone can be considered as an insufficient therapy.

Introduction: In the scientific literature complaints in patients with lipoedema are described as pain due to pressure or as tenderness. Objective: To better classify the quality of pain in lipoedema and to find out about the extent of complaints. Methods: 50 patients with lipoedema stage II received a questionnaire with 30 items containing adjectives of sensory and affective pain qualities. For these items they could choose between »fits exactly«, »fits fairly well«, »fits little« or »does not fit«. In addition, patients were asked to describe their complaints with their own words. Results: In most cases the items pressing and lumpish were chosen. Many patients used the characterizations heavy, tearing, distressing, enervating, fierce, unbearable, exhausting, and pinching. The median values of all the patients´ sensory and affective scores showed – compared to people with chronic pain – »average« values. However, by using their own words, the complaints were often described as extremely burdensome. Conclusion: For describing pain in lipoedema only few items were used by the patients. There were great interindividual variations. Aspects of pain can be quite burdensome; they should be used in the characterization and the grading of lipoedema. Key words: lipedema, pain assessment, pain experience scale

Introduction: Complaints of lipoedema are mainly referred to as pressure pain or tension in the scientific literature. Objective: The objective was to enable a further differentiation of the quality of the perceived discomfort and provide a preliminary quantification of pain severity. Methods: 50 patients with Stage II lipoedema were asked to complete a questionnaire containing 30 items corresponding to sensory and affective pain sensations. For these items, they could choose between “completely applicable”, “largely applicable”, “somewhat applicable”, or “not applicable”. The patients were also asked to describe their complaints in their own words. Results: The items pressing and dull were specified most frequently. The following were indicated to a lesser extent: severe, tearing, nagging, unnerving, fierce, unbearable, exhausting, and sharp. Compared to patients with chronic pain, the mean values of all the patients’ sensory and affective scores yielded an average pain severity. However, when the patients used their own formulations, the complaints were often described as being very pronounced. Conclusion: Only a small portion of the adjectives offered was suitable for characterising the sensations of lipoedema. There were considerable inter-individual variations in how the pain was perceived. The severe symptoms, which are partially subjective, should be considered when characterising lipoedema.

Lipoedema is a disease of women, characterised by a circumscribed accumulation of subcutaneous fat, mainly in the legs, with oedema, hematomas, and pain from tension and pressure. Up to now, only conservative treatment with manual lymphatic drainage and compression was possible. Nowadays surgical therapy with liposuction under tumescent local anaesthesia can not only improve morphology but can also reduce complaints. When performed with modern techniques by experienced surgeons, liposuction is very safe and highly effective. The combination of conservative and surgical methods can considerably improve quality of life.

In the guidelines for lipedema treatment, in addition to decongestive therapy, surgical therapy (liposuction) is advised as a standard treatment. However, in most cases the German social health insurance system refuses to pay for the costs of treatment. While primarily medical arguments are cited, it is clear that this refusal is chiefly due to the socioeconomic restrictions in the German social health insurance system. At present objective criteria in the form of prioritization are being tested for evaluation and to create a ranking list for the validity of treatment. For liposuction it is not yet clear whether in addition to an improvement in the quality of life, a reduction in lifetime treatment costs can be achieved.

A prospective single-center study with mail questionnaire – in most cases combined with clinical controls – was carried out in 112 patients with lipedema after a period from 8 months to nearly 7 years following liposuction in tumescent local anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Lipoedema is a painful disease in women with circumscribed increased subcutaneous fatty tissue, oedema, pain and bruising. Whereas conservative methods with combined decongestive therapy (manual lymphatic drainage, compression garments) have been well established over the past 50years, surgical therapy with tumescent liposuction has only been used for about 10years and long-term results are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of liposuction concerning appearance (body shape) and associated complaints after a long-term period. METHODS: A total of 164 patients who had undergone conservative therapy over a period of years, were treated by liposuction under tumescent local anaesthesia with vibrating microcannulas. In a monocentric study, 112 could be re-evaluated with a standardized questionnaire after a mean of 3years and 8months (range 1year and 1month to 7years and 4months) following the initial surgery and a mean of 2years and 11months (8months to 6years and 10months) following the last surgery. RESULTS: All patients showed a distinct reduction of subcutaneous fatty tissue (average 9846mL per person) with improvement of shape and normalization of body proportions. Additionally, they reported either a marked improvement or a complete disappearance of spontaneous pain, sensitivity to pressure, oedema, bruising, restriction of movement and cosmetic impairment, resulting in a tremendous increase in quality of life; all these complaints were reduced significantly (P<0·001). Patients with lipoedema stage II and III showed better improvement compared with patients with stage I. Physical decongestive therapy could be either omitted (22·4% of cases) or continued to a much lower degree. No serious complications (wound infection rate 1·4%, bleeding rate 0·3%) were observed following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Tumescent liposuction is a highly effective treatment for lipoedema with good morphological and functional long-term results.