Your search

In authors or contributors
Online resource
  • BACKGROUND: Lipedema is often unrecognized or misdiagnosed; despite an estimated prevalence of 10% in the overall female population, its cause is still unknown. There is increasing awareness of this condition, but its differential diagnosis can still be challenging. In this article, we summarize current hypotheses on its pathogenesis and the recommendations of current guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: This review is based on publications about lipedema that were retrieved by a selective search in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. RESULTS: The pathophysiology of lipedema remains unclear. The putative causes that have been proposed include altered adipogenesis, microangiopathy, and disturbed lymphatic microcirculation. No specific biomarker has yet been found, and the diagnosis is currently made on clinical grounds alone. Ancillary tests are used only to rule out competing diagnoses. The state of the evidence on treatment is poor. Treatment generally consists of complex decongestive therapy. In observational studies, liposuction for the permanent reduction of adipose tissue has been found to relieve symptoms to a significant extent, with only rare complications. The statutory healthinsurance carriers in Germany do not yet regularly cover the cost of the procedure; studies of high methodological quality will be needed before this is the case. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of lipedema remains a challenge because of the hetero - geneous presentation of the condition and the current lack of objective measuring instruments to characterize it. This review provides a guide to its diagnosis and treatment in an interdisciplinary setting. Research in this area should focus on the elucidation of the pathophysiology of lipedema and the development of a specific biomarker for it.

  • Within the subcutaneous adipose tissue diseases, multiple symmetric lipomatosis (MSL) (syn.: Launois Bensaude Syndrome, Morbus Madelung, benign symmetric lipomatosis) is rare. The pathogenesis of MSL remains unclear. We investigated the largest German cohort of MSL patients to obtain anamnestic data and quality of life with a standard questionnaire. Twenty-nine patients with confirmed MSL were included and filled in a questionnaire designed for this study. The questionnaire assessed common anamnestic factors, such as quality of life (EQ-5D-3L) and subjective treatment goals and success (“Patient-Benefit-Index-Lymphedema”, PBI-L). The gender distribution of the patients involved in the study was m/f: 1/4 (male: n = 6 (21%); female n = 23 (79%)). While the exact pathophysiology of MSL remains unclear, a subset of patients’ positive family history suggests a strong genetic factor, sometimes compatible with autosomal dominant inheritance. Patients with MSL showed lower health states (EQ VAS Score: m = 51, sd = 24, range = 0–90) than the German norm population (m = 77). Around two thirds (68%) of patients reported relevant benefits of therapy (liposuction/lipectomy). In our cohort about one third of the patients reported a positive family history for MSL-like features. Additionally, at least in some patients, a strong genetic factor, compatible with autosomal dominant inheritance, seems a possible major driver of MSL development. Alcohol consumption and MSL development has to be regarded as a controversial issue. Patients suffering from MSL have a clear decrease in quality of life and a marked wish for treatment.

  • Background: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder with disproportionate fat accumulation in the extremities and is often misdiagnosed as obesity. Although women with lipedema appear to be metabolically distinct from body mass index (BMI)-matched controls, their fasting metabolism remains insufficiently characterized. We therefore aimed to define the metabolic signature of lipedema using serum NMR metabolomics and anthropometric profiling. Methods: We conducted a study with 24 premenopausal women with lipedema and 21 BMI-matched controls. Fasting serum samples were analyzed using NMR spectroscopy and anthropometric data were collected. Regional body composition was additionally assessed in an exploratory matched DXA subset (n=12). To characterize coordinated metabolic differences beyond single analytes, we derived exploratory composite indices and applied multivariate analyses. Results: Despite similar BMI, women with lipedema showed lower waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and lower fasting insulin than controls (age-adjusted p=0.032). NMR profiling revealed lower alanine (p<0.001), lactate (p=0.004), pyruvate (p=0.021), and elevated ketone bodies (3-hydroxybutyric acid: p=0.009; acetoacetic acid: p=0.035; acetone: p=0.006). These alterations were reflected by significant group differences in composite indices for fat distribution (g=1.26; p<0.001), glycolysis (g=0.74; p=0.018), and ketone metabolism (g=0.70; p=0.018). Principal component analysis of the selected indices explained 78% of the total variance and showed partial group separation between lipedema and controls. Conclusion: Lipedema is associated with a distinct fasting metabolic profile characterized by reduced glycolytic intermediates, enhanced ketone body signals, and a more peripheral fat distribution despite comparable BMI. These findings support the concept of lipedema as a metabolically distinct phenotype and suggest that multivariate metabolic signatures may help refine future diagnostic and interventional approaches.

Last update from database: 5/28/26, 7:09 AM (UTC)

Explore

Resource type

Publication

Online resource