Your search
Results 6 resources
-
Introduction: In the scientific literature complaints in patients with lipoedema are described as pain due to pressure or as tenderness. Objective: To better classify the quality of pain in lipoedema and to find out about the extent of complaints. Methods: 50 patients with lipoedema stage II received a questionnaire with 30 items containing adjectives of sensory and affective pain qualities. For these items they could choose between »fits exactly«, »fits fairly well«, »fits little« or »does not fit«. In addition, patients were asked to describe their complaints with their own words. Results: In most cases the items pressing and lumpish were chosen. Many patients used the characterizations heavy, tearing, distressing, enervating, fierce, unbearable, exhausting, and pinching. The median values of all the patients´ sensory and affective scores showed – compared to people with chronic pain – »average« values. However, by using their own words, the complaints were often described as extremely burdensome. Conclusion: For describing pain in lipoedema only few items were used by the patients. There were great interindividual variations. Aspects of pain can be quite burdensome; they should be used in the characterization and the grading of lipoedema. Key words: lipedema, pain assessment, pain experience scale
-
In the guidelines for lipedema treatment, in addition to decongestive therapy, surgical therapy (liposuction) is advised as a standard treatment. However, in most cases the German social health insurance system refuses to pay for the costs of treatment. While primarily medical arguments are cited, it is clear that this refusal is chiefly due to the socioeconomic restrictions in the German social health insurance system. At present objective criteria in the form of prioritization are being tested for evaluation and to create a ranking list for the validity of treatment. For liposuction it is not yet clear whether in addition to an improvement in the quality of life, a reduction in lifetime treatment costs can be achieved.
-
BACKGROUND: Long-term results following liposuction in patients with lipoedema are available only for an average period of 4 years. OBJECTIVE: To find out whether the improvement of complaints persists for a further 4 years. METHODS: In a single-centre study, 85 patients with lipoedema had already been examined after 4 years. A mail questionnaire - often in combination with clinical controls - was repeated after another 4 years (8 years after liposuction). RESULTS: Compared with the results after 4 years, the improvement in spontaneous pain, sensitivity to pressure, oedema, bruising and restriction of movement persisted. The same held true for patient self-assessment of cosmetic appearance, quality of life and overall impairment. Eight years after surgery, the reduction in the amount of conservative treatment (combined decongestive therapy, compression garments) was similar to that observed 4 years earlier. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate for the first time the long-lasting positive effects of liposuction in patients with lipoedema.
Explore
Topic
- Guidelines and Consensus (2)
- Lipedema (6)
- Original studies and data (1)
- Review (3)
- Therapeutics (1)
Resource type
- Journal Article (6)