Your search

Background/Objectives: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate fat accumulation and inflammation, predominantly affecting women. While recent evidence suggests a systemic pro-inflammatory state in lipedema, the role of diet in modulating inflammation remains underexplored. This study assessed the anti-inflammatory potential of a Mediterranean-style ketogenic diet and its effects after 7 months of adherence on systemic inflammation markers (CRP and IL-6) in women with lipedema (n = 24) and a control group with overweight/obesity (n = 24). Methods: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) was used to characterize the inflammatory potential of the diet throughout the intervention. Dietary intake was analyzed pre- and post-intervention, and anthropometric, body composition, and biochemical parameters were measured. Results: Beyond its beneficial effects on body composition (significant reductions in body weight, fat, leg circumferences, and visceral fat), the intervention diet also demonstrated anti-inflammatory potential. In lipedema, baseline diet showed a pro-inflammatory DII profile (DII/day = 3.04), which was reduced by about 1.5 points after the intervention (p = 0.008). When expressed per 1000 kcal, the DII values were markedly lower for both baseline (DII = 0.22) and intervention diet (DII = ~0.01). Following the intervention diet, reduction in CRP (-0.39, p = 0.016) and IL-6 levels (-0.33, p = 0.034) in lipedema were observed. A significant positive association was observed between the intervention diet's DII and CRP (r = 0.55, p = 0.005), and between the baseline diet's DII and IL-6 (r = 0.50, p = 0.013) in lipedema group. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ketogenic diet rich in anti-inflammatory and antioxidant nutrients can reduce systemic inflammation in lipedema patients, independently of caloric restriction.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic disorder of adipose tissue that predominantly affects women and is frequently misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. Traditionally associated with the lower extremities, lipedema can also involve the abdominal region, although there are currently no established diagnostic criteria for abdominal lipedema. This study aims to propose a diagnostic algorithm for abdominal lipedema based on clinical features, macroscopic observations, and ultrasound findings. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 327 patients treated between March 2018 and March 2024 for lipedema, including those with abdominal involvement. Clinical evaluations, ultrasound imaging, and surgical outcomes were examined to assess the prevalence and characteristics of abdominal lipedema. Patients were classified based on lipedema severity, and criteria for abdominal lipedema diagnosis were established through clinical and imaging data. RESULTS: The study identified that abdominal involvement increases with the severity of lipedema, with 31% of patients with stage II lipedema and 70% of those with stage III lipedema exhibiting abdominal manifestations. The proposed diagnostic algorithm includes maximum, major, and minor criteria, such as symmetrical fat deposition, pain, and non-responsiveness to diet and exercise. Specific threshold values for each category were defined to establish the diagnosis. The findings highlight the existence of both ascending (from legs to abdomen) and descending (from arms to abdomen) centripetal progression patterns, challenging traditional notions that limit lipedema to the extremities CONCLUSION: Abdominal lipedema is a significant and underrecognized manifestation of the condition, requiring specific diagnostic criteria to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The study proposes a diagnostic framework based on clinical and imaging features that can improve the recognition and management of abdominal lipedema. Multidisciplinary treatment approaches, including both conservative measures and surgical interventions such as abdominoplasty and liposuction, are recommended to improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Lipoedema (lipalgia) is a condition that is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphoedema, which can result in mismanagement of treatment leading to poor mental and physical outcomes. It is a condition that is predominately seen in those assigned female at birth and rarely identified at an early age. Inconsistencies regarding criteria used for diagnosis and staging has led to challenges in the reliability of treatment options available for people with the condition. Poor diagnosis can substantially impact on a person's quality of life in terms of mental health, physical health and finances. Lipoedema has different stages and classifications according to visual characteristics. Recommended developments of practice include the setting up of a diagnostic criteria to identify key symptoms of lipoedema, which can help practitioners consider effective treatment options alongside diet, exercise, compression therapy and skin care as part of the overall treatment plan.

ObjectiveTo assess the relationship between disease severity in lipedema and tissue stiffness measured using shear wave elastography (SWE) concerning pain threshold and quality of life as well as determine differences in subcutaneous tissue stiffness between patients with lipedema and healthy subjects.Methods71 participants were subjected to measurements using subcutaneous tissue elastic modulus with SWE imaging of lower limbs at three anatomical levels. The participants were divided into two groups: those diagnosed with lipedema (Group (1) (n = 35) and healthy subjects (Group (2) (n = 36). Patients with lipedema were categorized into three stages based on disease severity. Pain levels were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold through algometric measurement within lipedema stages, and quality of life using EQ-5D quality of life scale in all groups.ResultsNo statistically significant differences in age, BMI, right and left three-zone elastic modulus averages were observed between the groups within BMI levels of 25-29.9 and ≥30 kg/m2 (p > .05). Same BMI group, according to lipedema stage, the mean elastic modulus of the right pretibial region in stage 2 cases was significantly higher than in stage 1 cases within BMI levels of 25-29.9 kg/m2 (p < .05). The all-region algometric measurements in Group 1 were significantly lower than those in Group 2, within BMI levels of 25-29.9 kg/m2 and ≥30 kg/m2. The average spontaneous VAS scores in Group 1 were significantly higher than those in Group 2 within the same BMI (p < .05). The VAS palpation scores in Group 1 exceeded those in Group 2 for BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (p < .05). No significant difference in VAS palpation scores was observed for BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2 (p > .05). The EQ-5D VAS scores of the control group were significantly lower than those of stage 1, 2, and 3 cases (p < .05).ConclusionsIn lipedema, pain characteristics may be more distinctive than the elastic properties of adipose tissue. Increased algometric measurements may reflect a specific objective sensation.

BackgroundTo evaluate kinesiophobia and its relationship with disease-related characteristics and quality of life in lipedema patients.MethodsIn this descriptive case-control study, 40 lipedema patients and 40 participants in the control group were included. All participants were evaluated in terms of body mass index (BMI), pain numeric rating scale (NRS) and pain threshold (PT) scores, kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia - TSK), lower extremity functional scores (Lower Extremity Functional Scale - LEFS), and health-related quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile - NHP) scores. Additionally, the lipedema patients were evaluated in terms of extremity volumes, and total and mean lower extremity fat mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.ResultsHigh kinesiophobia was detected in 78% of the lipedema patients and 55% of the control group (p = .033). TSK (p = .048), NRS (p = .001), and NHP total scores (p = .041) were higher and PT scores (p = .007) were lower in lipedema patients compared to the control group. No difference was found between lipedema patients with high and low kinesiophobia in terms of fat mass or extremity volumes. A positive correlation was found between TSK score, NHP total score (r = 0.356, p = .024), NHP physical activity (ρ = 0.403, p = .010) and NHP energy (ρ = 0.436, p = .005) subscale scores.ConclusionKinesiophobia is highly prevalent in lipedema patients, regardless of disease-related data and affecting the quality of life of the patients, negatively.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is an adipose tissue disorder involving mostly women. One of the most characteristic lipedema symptoms is painful accumulation of adipose tissue in lower and upper extremities leading to disproportion. Due to the disproportionate body shape, it is recently thought that BMI (Body Mass Index) might not be fully sufficient to identify the weight ratios among lipedema patients and it is suggested to consider replacing BMI with WHtR (Waist-to-height ratio). PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to present the characteristic features of lipedema patients and the usefulness of BMI and WHtR among lipedema patients in reference to symptoms severity, quality of life and body composition. METHODS: Forty-four women with lipedema were asked to rate their symptoms in a scale from 0 to 10, and to complete SF-36 questionnaire affecting quality of life. Participants also had body composition assessment. RESULTS: Participants experienced various lipedema symptoms such as: heaviness in affected areas (97.7%), pain at palpation (100%), spontaneous pain (82%), disproportionate body shape and tendency to bruising (88.6%). The level of pain was strictly correlated with patients' daily functioning (R = 0.79, p = 1.9*10- 10). The quality of life among participants measured with SF-36 was 57.4/100. WHtR enabled the same group of patients to be divided into three nearly equal groups, while BMI only divided them into two groups. Statistically significant differences could be observed both between BMI and WHtR groups. CONCLUSION: Lipedema symptoms have a direct impact on functioning of patients. Quality of life is decreased among women with lipedema. WHtR should be considered as a tool in identification of obesity among lipedema population.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic, progressive and underdiagnosed condition characterized by bilateral, disproportionate and painful subcutaneous fat accumulation in extremities. Key symptoms include pain, heaviness and easy bruising. Surgical treatment, particularly liposuction, has shown excellent outcomes in symptom reduction and quality of life improvement. This study evaluates clinical outcomes in symptoms and aesthetic self-perception improvements in patients treated with selective combined liposuction (SCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 126 female patients who underwent surgical treatment over a four-year period was performed. Selective tumescent liposuction combining power-assisted liposuction (PAL) with VASER (ultrasound-assisted liposuction) for proximal areas, especially the thighs. Demographic and clinical data, including BMI, medical history and comorbidities were analyzed. Symptoms such as pain, heaviness and edema, and body image perception were assessed preoperatively and six months postoperatively with a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 39 years, with a mean BMI of 27.2. The mean aspirated volume was 3270 mL per procedure. In 25.4% of the cases (n=32), a second procedure was required, with an average total aspirated volume of 5150 mL. Significant symptom improvement was observed: 89% reported reduced pain, 92% reduced heaviness, 82% reduced edema. Mobility limitations improved in 91% of patients, while 60% reported enhanced aesthetic perception of their extremities. Additionally, 68% of patients expanded their wardrobe postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Selective combined liposuction is a safe and highly effective technique for lipedema treatment, providing substantial symptom relief, improved body aesthetic self-perception, which leads to an improvement in the quality of life.

Lipoedema is a disease that affects women and is characterised by an abnormal accumulation of fatty tissue, with pain and a feeling of heaviness in the lower limbs. Approximately 30 % of patients also have involvement of the upper limbs. The cause of lipoedema is unknown, but familial clustering of the condition suggests an underlying genetic cause. Oestrogen and hormonal changes appear to be involved, as the condition occurs predominantly in women and is linked to hormonal fluctuations. In Norway, women with lipoedema have had limited access to treatment within the public health service, and the condition is relatively unknown among Norwegian healthcare personnel. Internationally, the diagnosis and treatment of lipoedema are largely based on consensus, as there is a lack of definitive scientific evidence in relation to pathophysiology and treatment. This clinical review presents lipoedema diagnostics and treatment based on clinical experience and international published consensus statements.

Adipose tissue, or “fat”, has become synonymous with obesity. The public discourse frames a desire to reduce or even banish this tissue at almost every turn, with reasons ranging from aesthetics to health improvements. During decades of research into the development of adipose tissue-reducing interventions, there has also been an increasing acknowledgement and understanding of the physiological necessity for adipose tissue. Functional adipose tissue contributes to overall health due to its role in an incredibly diverse array of processes. For that reason, dysfunction in this tissue continues to be linked to a wide variety of pathologies, from infection to cancer and everything in between. In this book, we gather expert input from those currently expanding this field to provide insight into the importance of adipose tissue.

INTRODUCTION: Lipedema is a chronic and progressive disease that predominantly affects women, characterized by a disproportionate increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT), particularly in the lower limbs. It is associated with significant physical disability, chronic pain, thromboembolism, and psychosocial distress. Despite its profound impact on women's health and quality of life, lipedema remains underrecognized and insufficiently studied, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 10% among women worldwide. Although the exact etiology of lipedema remains unclear, emerging evidence suggests a multifactorial origin involving genetic predisposition, hormonal influences, and vascular dysfunction-all contributing to its development and progression. Current therapeutic options provide only partial symptom relief and remain noncurative, highlighting the urgent need for expanded research and improved management strategies. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to assess the current understanding of lipedema pathophysiology and current treatment options. Research articles were sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases. Over 100 studies were incorporated. RESULTS: This review provides a comprehensive overview of lipedema, encompassing its clinical features, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, and current treatment modalities. Additionally, the review discusses whether the molecular and metabolic differences between abdominal and femoral AT depots mirror those observed in classical obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary, research-informed care is essential for managing lipedema, combining conservative therapies, tailored exercise, and liposuction for advanced cases. More research to better understand the underlying pathophysiology is critical to developing targeted treatments, improving diagnostic accuracy, and informing standardized, evidence-based care.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effects of a multimodal exercise program on edema, pain, exercise capacity, lower extremity muscle strength, and function in patients with lipedema.Methods: The patients diagnosed with lipedema were randomly assigned to either the exercise (n: 11) or control (n: 11) groups. The exercise group participated in supervised group exercises focusing on aerobic and strengthening, twice a week for 6 weeks. The control group received training on physical activity additionally lipedema management. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Edema (circumference measurements and local tissue water-LTW%), pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale-VAS) and pressure pain threshold (Algometer), functional exercise capacity (Six minute walk test-6MWT), lower extremity muscle strength (Handheld dynamometer), lower extremity muscle strength/endurance (Sit-to-stand test) and lower extremity function (Lower Extremity Functional Scale-LEFS) were evaluated.Results: In the exercise group, significant reductions in pain during rest, activity, and nighttime, 6MWT distance, quadriceps and hip muscle strength, lower extremity strength/endurance, and function were observed (p < .05). When comparing the groups, no significant differences were found (p > .05); however, clinically, there were differences in limb volumes, pain reduction, muscle strength, and functional improvements, with medium to large effect sizes.Conclusion: The main findings of this study highlight the benefits of structured multimodal exercises for patients with lipedema to improve pain, limb volumes, exercise capacity, lower extremity muscle strength, endurance, and functionality.Clinical trials number: NCT06811961.

Lipedema is an adipose tissue disorder that principally affects women and is frequently misidentified as obesity or lymphedema. There have been relatively few studies that have precisely defined the pathogenesis, epidemiology, and treatment approaches for lipedema. However, successfully recognizing lipedema as a distinct condition is important for proper management. This review aimed to examine the existing literature on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, and treatments for lipedema. The current research indicates that lipedema appears to be a clinical entity related to genetic factors and fat distribution, although distinct from lymphedema and obesity. Some available treatments include complex decongestive physiotherapy, liposuction, and laser-assisted lipolysis. The management of lipedema is complex and differs from that of lymphedema. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to continue advancing our understanding of this often neglected disease and exploring optimal medical and surgical treatment regimens tailored specifically for lipedema patients. In summary, despite frequent misdiagnosis, enhanced recognition, and research into customized therapeutic strategies for this poorly characterized but likely underdiagnosed disorder represent promising steps forward. Level of evidence  N/A.

Background: Pain is a prevalent symptom in patients with lipedema predominantly impacting the lower extremities. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and vitamin B12 levels and neuropathic pain (NP) in patients diagnosed with lipedema. Methods and Results: A total of 243 patients with lipedema who had 25(OH)D and B12 levels measured in the past 6 months were included in this study. Participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 (N = 78) with NP scores ≥13 and Group 2 (N = 165) with NP scores <13. The Turkish version of the painDETECT questionnaire was used to assess the patients' NP symptoms. Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and pain threshold through algometric measurement. Group 1 had significantly higher palpation and spontaneous VAS scores, and pain threshold through algometric measurements than Group 2 (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding vitamin D levels being below 30 ng/mL or vitamin B12 levels being below 400 pg/mL (p > 0.05). Conclusions: No association was found between NP and 25(OH)D or B12 levels in patients with lipedema.

Lipedema diagnosis is heavily reliant on patient history. Various objective assessments have been suggested; however, a standardized measurement process is lacking. A systematic review was undertaken to identify which imaging and measurement tools are used in lipedema quantification and to review their protocols. Six databases were searched with two reviewers screening citations for inclusion. Full peer-reviewed publications that included defined lipedema diagnosis criteria, no male cases within comparative cohorts, and used an imaging or measurement tool to quantify lipedema were included. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria using 13 different tools to quantify individual physical lipedema characteristics to either enable differential diagnosis, and/or quantify treatment effect: tape measure, perometry, durometry, tonometry, bioimpedance spectroscopy, tissue di-electric constant, ultrasound, Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), noncontrast MRI lymphangiography, Indocyanine green lymphography, lymphoscintigraphy, and dynamic lymphangiography. Eight imaging and five measurement tools assessed lymphatic transport disturbances (n = 8), limb size/volume (n = 4), adipose tissue thickness/mass/volume (n = 3), and tissue fluid presence (n = 2). Multiple tools were only used in studies completed in 2020 or later. A lack of consistency exists in tool protocols, measurement locations, and outcome analysis. Limited reporting of clinimetrics with data derived from small cohorts and heterogenous populations impacted the ability to recommend tools for clinical practice and research. Various tools were used for objective lipedema assessment; however, consistency in approach was lacking. Further investigations are required to establish the validity and reliability of measurement and imaging tools, protocols, measurement points, and outcome reporting/interpretation to quantify the physical attributes of lipedema.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the presence of lipedema and lipedema-related factors in fibromyalgia patients. METHODS: The study included 100 female patients over the age of 18 who met the fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. The patients were evaluated for the presence/stages of lipedema. The body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, waist-height ratio, and presence of hematoma tendency/telangiectasias were recorded. Patients were asked to mark the severity of their pain (widespread/on lipedema) on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). The ACR 2016 Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria, The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire were applied. RESULTS: Lipedema was observed in 50% of the patients (58% Stage 1 lipedema). In the lipedema group, age, duration of fibromyalgia diagnosis, hematoma tendency/presence of telangiectasias (for all; p < .001), menopausal status (p = .004), BDI score (p = .04), BMI (p = .02), history of medication for fibromyalgia (p = .01) were higher, and age at menarche (p = .01) was lower. Lipedema stage was moderately positively correlated with BMI, number of pregnancies (for both; r:0.53 p < .001) and waist-height ratio (r:0.43 p:0.002), while VAS-lipedema pain intensity was strongly positively correlated with VAS-widespread pain intensity (r:0.62 p < .001), and moderately positively correlated with symptom severity score (r:0.55 p < .001), BMI (r:0.54 p < .001), and fibromyalgia severity score (r:0.51 p < .001). Long fibromyalgia diagnosis time (p: 0.005), and low age at menarche (p: 0.05) were significant risk factors for the presence of lipedema. CONCLUSIONS: Lipedema is common in fibromyalgia patients. Long fibromyalgia diagnosis time and low age at menarche are significant risk factors for the presence of lipedema.

Lipedema, historically underrecognized, has recently gained attention due to advancements in research and growing public awareness. The Brazilian Consensus Statement on Lipedema, developed by the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, aims to establish clear recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of lipedema. Using the Delphi methodology, experts elaborated 90 statements about lipedema, which were then evaluated by a panel of 113 professionals. The statements were analyzed using SurveyMonkey, with a 75% agreement threshold required for their inclusion in the consensus statement. Most statements achieved significant consensus, with only 9 topics requiring further investigation. This consensus statement highlights the complexity of lipedema, the effectiveness of conservative treatment over surgery, the need for multidisciplinary approaches, and the importance of awareness to reduce underdiagnosis and stigma. It also underscores the ongoing need for research to develop more effective management strategies.

PURPOSE: To describe and analyse experiences of living with lipedema. Methods: Individual, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 12 women diagnosed with lipedema and analysed by qualitative content analysis utilizing an inductive approach. RESULTS: The overarching theme, "An uncertain uphill battle against a divergent body and societal ignorance", covers the experiences of living with lipedema and is based on five categories; "Captivated by a disintegrating body", "Face the impairments of a chronic condition", "Experience social exclusion", "Need emotional support to go on" and "Mull over an insecure future". The women felt entrapped within their bodies and experienced social exclusion due to the chronic symptoms and the progressive body shape alteration caused by their illness. Having experienced deficient information on the illness, varying support from other people, and a deteriorating economic situation, the women face an uncertain future. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms and restrictions caused by lipedema affect women's livelihood and future, as there are no indications for disease improvement. Preventive work aimed at reducing health deterioration should be a priority. More research is needed to raise healthcare awareness regarding difficulties experienced by patients with lipedema.