Your search

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder primarily affecting women, characterized by abnormal fat accumulation, pain, and reduced mobility. Its impact on sexual function remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate sexual function in women with lipedema and examine its associations with anxiety, depression, lower extremity function, and quality of life. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 100 sexually active women were recruited: 50 with lipedema and 50 age- and Body Mass Index-matched healthy controls. Sexual function was assessed with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI); anxiety and depression with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D); quality of life with the EuroQOL 5-Dimensional 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument; lower extremity function with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); and pain intensity with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors associated with the total FSFI score. RESULTS: Women with lipedema had significantly lower total FSFI scores compared to controls (21.58 ± 3.99 vs. 25.86 ± 3.21, P < .001), with 76% having FSFI scores below the cut-off (≤ 26.55) compared to 36% of controls. All FSFI domain scores were significantly lower in the lipedema group (all P < .05). In the lipedema group, there was a significant correlation between total FSFI scores and age (P = .002), pain intensity (VAS; P = .022), depression (HADS-D; P = .010), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index; P = .027), and lower extremity function (LEFS; P < .001). Multiple linear regression analysis identified depression (HADS-D; P = .047), perceived health status (EQ-5D-5L VAS; P = .033), and lower extremity function (LEFS; P = .011) as independent variables that had a significant relationship with the total FSFI score. DISCUSSION: Lower sexual function is common among women with lipedema and is associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms, lower extremity function, and pain intensity. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating sexual function assessment into the routine evaluation of patients with lipedema and support the need for comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment approaches addressing physical, psychological, and sexual health aspects of care.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare metabolic status and biochemical indices associated with cardiovascular risk, including the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, triglyceride-glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI), and atherogenic lipid indices, between obese individuals with and without lipedema, and to evaluate the potential effect of lipedema on these parameters.Materials and MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 70 obese patients diagnosed with lipedema and 70 obese control individuals without lipedema. Fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were recorded. Based on these parameters, the TyG index, TyG-BMI, atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), atherogenic coefficient (AC), and Castelli risk indices I (CRI-I) and II (CRI-II) were calculated.ResultsNo significant differences were observed between the lipedema and control groups in fasting glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride levels, TyG, TyG-BMI, or atherogenic lipid indices (all p > .05). LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly lower in the lipedema group compared with the control group (p = .008). In the lipedema group, TyG-BMI showed a positive correlation with age and BMI, whereas no significant associations were found with symptom duration or pain severity.ConclusionAlthough LDL-cholesterol levels were lower in obese individuals with lipedema, this difference was not reflected in biochemical indices associated with metabolic status and cardiovascular risk. Importantly, metabolic parameters in patients with lipedema accompanied by obesity were comparable to those observed in individuals with obesity alone, suggesting that obesity rather than lipedema may be a more important determinant of metabolic risk in this population. Therefore, metabolic evaluation should not be overlooked in patients with lipedema, and the management of obesity should be considered in treatment planning.

INTRODUCTION: Recent research suggests that body contouring surgeries may reduce benzodiazepine (BNZ) use in patients with anxiety or depressive disorders. This study explores whether similar benefits occur in women with lipedema-a chronic adipose disorder causing pain, limited mobility, and psychological distress-who are often prescribed BNZ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study on 100 adult female patients with Stage I-III lipedema undergoing tumescent or water-assisted liposuction between 2019 and 2024. All participants were on stable BNZ therapy for at least six months before surgery. The primary outcome was BNZ usage at six months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included anxiety (GAD-7), pain (VAS), sleep quality (PSQI), and body image (BODY-Q) and assessed pre- and post-surgery using validated instruments. DISCUSSION: At six months, 77% of patients reduced or discontinued BNZ (32% stopped entirely), with average daily dosage decreasing from 3.2 ± 1.1 to 1.4 ± 1.2 mg (p < 0.001). Statistically significant improvements were also observed in anxiety, pain, sleep quality, and body image (all p < 0.001). Reductions in BNZ use correlated with improvements in pain (r = 0.56), anxiety (r = 0.47), and body image (r = - 0.52). Only minor complications occurred (8%), and no major adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Liposuction for lipedema not only improves physical symptoms but also supports psychological recovery, reducing dependence on benzodiazepines. These findings highlight the potential of surgical treatment as part of an integrated approach to managing chronic conditions with both somatic and mental health components. Further research is needed to confirm long-term effects and underlying mechanisms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Level I, therapeutic study using a properly randomized controlled trial. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

ObjectivesThere is a deficiency in awareness and knowledge of lipedema disease among the general public and healthcare professionals. This situation may lead patients to waste time on getting the correct diagnosis and treatment. Currently, information regarding women's awareness and knowledge level of lipedema in Turkey is limited. This study aims to examine women's awareness, knowledge level, and desire for information concerning lipedema in Turkey.MethodsA total of 502 volunteer women participated in this online cross-sectional survey study. The survey, constructed by the authors of the study with the assistance of guidelines, systematic reviews, and current literature, consisted of sections aimed at determining demographic data, lipedema awareness, knowledge level, lipedema symptoms and suspicion, as well as individuals' health behavior and desire for information. The primary outcome of the study was lipedema awareness, which was defined by having previously heard the term lipedema.ResultsDespite 76.1% of participants reporting awareness of lipedema, the average knowledge score about the condition was a low-to-moderate level of knowledge. The vast majority of participants (71.3%) indicated that they were willing to learn more about lipedema, and their preferred source of information was healthcare professionals (80.3%). Yet, only 19 participants (3.8%) think that lipedema is sufficiently regarded within the healthcare system.ConclusionThis study reveals that, despite relatively high awareness of lipedema among women in Turkey, the level of knowledge remains limited. The strong willingness to receive further knowledge and the preference for healthcare professionals as the principal source of information garner attention. However, the low confidence in the recognition of lipedema within the healthcare system may suggest that healthcare professionals have insufficient knowledge or do not prioritize this issue. Improving awareness and knowledge of lipedema among the public and healthcare professionals might facilitate early identification and minimize treatment delays.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a prevalent chronic condition in women, characterized by a painful and symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue primarily in the lower limbs. Its diagnosis is based on specific clinical characteristics; however, these characteristics lack robust scientific validation. Furthermore, lipedema is frequently misdiagnosed as obesity. This study aims to compare quality of life and physical and psychological characteristics between patients with obesity with and without lipedema. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 30 patients with obesity and lipedema (Lip-Obes group) and 29 patients with only obesity (nonLip-Obes group). Quality of life, body composition (BMI, fat free mass, fat mass, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, leg volume), pain (pain pattern, pressure pain thresholds, pain interference, pain distribution, symptoms of neuropathic pain), physical functioning (hand grip strength, quadriceps strength, functional exercise capacity, functional mobility and physical activity level), and psychosocial functioning (pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety, and stress, body image dissatisfaction, self-efficacy, and eating difficulties) were assessed using clinical measurements and self-reported outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Compared to the nonLip-Obes group, the Lip-Obes group showed greater impairments in quality of life (p < 0.05). Despite similar body composition variables, the Lip-Obes group had lower waist-to-hip, waist-to-height, upper leg-to-waist, and lower leg-to-waist ratios, as well as higher total limb volume than the nonLip-Obes group. Additionally, the Lip-Obes group reported higher pain intensity, lower pressure pain thresholds in the arms and legs, and greater pain interference than the nonLip-Obes group (p < 0.05). Although hand-grip strength and physical activity levels were comparable, the Lip-Obes group exhibited lower quadriceps strength, functional exercise capacity, and functional mobility (p < 0.05). Additionally, the Lip-Obes group reported higher pain catastrophizing, greater body image dissatisfaction, and more severe eating difficulties than the nonLip-Obes group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in depression, anxiety, stress, or self-efficacy between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional study highlights the complex nature of lipedema, providing preliminary evidence of differences in quality of life and distinct body composition and physical and physiological characteristics between patients with obesity with and without lipedema. These results emphasize the need for further research to identify diagnostic biomarkers for lipedema through in-depth investigations. Future studies should also focus on developing and optimizing a multidisciplinary treatment approach tailored to the unique characteristics of patients with lipedema.

OBJECTIVE: To compare central sensitization (CS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and psychosocial factors between women with lipedema and healthy controls and to identify variables associated with CS in lipedema. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 30 women with clinically diagnosed lipedema and 30 age-matched healthy controls were assessed.CS was measured with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), and PPT was recorded bilaterally at the deltoid, lateral thigh, and medial knee using an algometer, pain-related cognitions with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and mood with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Compared with controls, the lipedema group had lower PPTs at all sites (all p ≤ 0.001) and higher CSI scores (p ≤ 0.001). CS prevalence (CSI ≥ 40) was 70.0% in lipedema versus 23.3% in controls (p≤ 0.001). HADS-Depression (p = 0.001), HADS-Anxiety (p = 0.017), and PCS helplessness, magnification, rumination, and total scores (all p ≤ 0.006) were higher in lipedema. In the total sample, CSI correlated negatively with all PPT values (all p ≤ 0.003) and positively with HADS-Depression/Anxiety and PCS scores (all p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis among patients with lipedema, higher CSI was associated with greater BMI (β = 1.117, p=0.018), hypertension (β = 15.918, p = 0.009), diabetes mellitus (β = 16.663, p = 0.002), higher VAS pain (β = 0.368, p = 0.002), lower right medial knee PPT (β = - 3.891, p = 0.011), and higher HADS-Depression (β = 1.307, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Lipedema is associated with lower pain thresholds and higher CS, alongside greater depressive and anxiety symptoms and pain catastrophizing. CS in lipedema appears linked to pain intensity, depressive symptoms, and cardiometabolic comorbidities. These findings suggest that management should complement peripheral approaches with strategies targeting central pain mechanisms and psychosocial factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic and progressive adipose tissue disorder that is often misdiagnosed and notoriously resistant to weight loss. Liposuction remains the most effective surgical treatment, but it requires precise technique to preserve the fragile lymphatic system. This study investigates the utility of pre-, intra- and postoperative ultrasound (US) to objectively assess fat reduction and the selective removal of pathological adipose tissue in patients undergoing liposuction for lipedema. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study of 24 female patients with lipedema who underwent liposuction of the lower extremities. Perioperative US was used to measure the thickness of the superficial subcutaneous fat (D1) and the deep fat layer (D2) at a standardized anatomical site. Intraoperative US was employed to verify that fat aspiration was performed in the correct superficial plane. A paired t-test was conducted to assess the statistical significance of the change in D1 thickness. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 38 years, with a mean BMI of 25.3 kg/m2. The mean volume of liposuction aspirate was 4.5 L. Statistical analysis showed a significant reduction in mean D1 thickness from 9.9 mm preoperatively to 6.3 mm immediately postoperatively (p < 0,05). This reduction was sustained at the 3-month follow-up, with a mean D1 thickness of 5.8 mm. CONCLUSION: Our pilot study suggests that the perioperative use of ultrasound is a valuable tool for objectively documenting the selective fat reduction achieved with liposuction in lipedema patients. Intraoperative US not only enhances surgical precision, but also reduces the risk of complications by confirming correct cannula positioning in the superficial plane. This technique enhances surgical precision by allowing for the quantifiable removal of pathological superficial fat, confirming its potential to improve outcomes with a low complication rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

BackgroundLipedema is an adipose disorder associated with multiple impairments. Conservative treatments remain the mainstay of management, yet evidence regarding the effects of physical therapies on clinical, imaging, and body composition outcomes is limited. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) has been proposed as a non-invasive therapeutic option, although its impact is not fully established.MethodsThis was a prospective, longitudinal, within-patient study conducted in women with clinically diagnosed lipedema. One lower limb was treated with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), whereas the contralateral limb served as an internal control. A total of 16 patients were initially assessed, of whom 12 completed the full follow-up and were included in the final analysis. rESWT was applied over six sessions (two sessions per week) using standardized parameters. Clinical outcomes (LEFS, EQ-5D, SF-36 Physical Function, and IPAQ) were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Ultrasound and elastography were used to evaluate subcutaneous tissue thickness and stiffness at predefined leg and thigh sites, while segmental bioimpedance analysis assessed body composition and fluid distribution. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using mixed-effects models.ResultsSignificant improvements were observed in functional capacity, quality of life, and physical activity levels at both 6 weeks and 3 months compared with baseline (p < .05). In contrast, no statistically significant changes were detected in ultrasound-derived tissue thickness, elastography measurements, or bioimpedance parameters over time, and no significant differences were detected between treated and control limbs within the constraints of the available sample size.ConclusionsrESWT was associated with meaningful clinical and functional improvements in patients with lipedema, despite the absence of detectable changes in tissue thickness, stiffness, or body composition. These findings suggest that the benefits of rESWT may be mediated through symptom modulation and functional adaptation rather than structural tissue modification, supporting its role as part of conservative, symptom-oriented treatment strategies in lipedema.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by abnormal and disproportionate fat accumulation in the extremities, leading to pain, edema, and functional impairment. Liposuction has become a central component of surgical management. However, postoperative complications, particularly seroma formation, remain a concern. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of postoperative seroma and associated risk factors in patients undergoing liposuction for lipedema treatment, based on procedures performed by a single surgical team in a single institution. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 93 female patients who underwent liposuction for lipedema between April 2019 and January 2024. Data collected included demographic variables, body mass index (BMI), anesthesia type, volume of aspirated fat, percentage of body weight removed, use of adjunct technologies (ultrasound or laser), association with other surgeries such as varicose vein surgery, and prior conservative treatment. The primary outcome was the development of postoperative seroma. Statistical analysis included Chi-square and Student's t-tests and multivariable logistic regression, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Among 93 cases, 17 patients (18.3%) developed postoperative seroma. Higher volumes of aspirated fat (% body weight) were significantly associated with seroma formation (7.27% vs. 5.84%, p = 0.005). Concomitant minor procedures were also linked to increased seroma incidence (p = 0.035). No seromas occurred in patients treated using ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Minor complications included one infection and one hematoma (1.07%). CONCLUSIONS: Liposuction for lipedema is a safe and effective surgical option with a low rate of major complications, but seroma remains a relatively frequent postoperative finding. Higher aspirated fat volumes relative to body weight and the presence of concomitant procedures increase the risk of seroma. No seromas were observed in the ultrasound-assisted group; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance and should be considered only as hypothesis-generating. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and guide surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Background/Objectives: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate fat accumulation, pain, microvascular dysfunction, and low-grade inflammation. Although low-carbohydrate, high-fat (LCHF) dietary approaches are increasingly used in clinical practice, their longer-term associations with vascular, lymphatic, and immunometabolic pathways in lipedema remain insufficiently understood. This preliminary exploratory study evaluated clinical outcomes and circulating mediators during a 7-month LCHF dietary intervention. Methods: Twenty-four women with lipedema (median age: 39 years) underwent a 7-month individualized, calorie-restricted LCHF diet under medical supervision. Outcomes included body mass index (BMI), leg volume, and adipose tissue pain assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Fasting serum samples collected at baseline and follow-up were analyzed for angiogenic, inflammatory, endothelial, and lipid mediators using Luminex assays and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: The intervention was associated with significant reductions in BMI, leg volume, and adipose tissue pain (p < 0.001). These changes were accompanied by increased vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D), and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), together with decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines and endothelial adhesion molecules. Several endocannabinoid-related lipid mediators, including oleoyl ethanolamide (OEA), arachidonoyl ethanolamide (AEA), and palmitoyl ethanolamide (PEA), also decreased. Baseline OEA and AEA concentrations, as well as reductions in OEA over time, were associated with greater BMI reduction. Change in interleukin-8 (IL-8) showed a nominal association with leg volume reduction, while pain improvement was associated with decreases in P-selectin and VEGF-A and increases in interleukin-13 (IL-13). Conclusions: A 7-month calorie-restricted LCHF dietary intervention in women with lipedema was associated with clinical improvement and changes in circulating vascular, inflammatory, and lipid mediators. These findings reflect systemic changes accompanying the intervention; however, causal relationships and specific mechanisms cannot be established.

ObjectiveTo analyse and compare the prevalence of comorbidities associated with lipedema in Spanish women with that in the general population.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using an anonymous online questionnaire distributed among lipedema patient associations in Spain. Sociodemographic variables, clinical aspects, and comorbidities were collected. These were then compared with data from the 2023 National Health Survey, which represents the general Spanish population. The prevalence of each pathology was compared using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Age-group contributions were assessed using standardised residuals from expected/observed contingency tables, considering absolute values >1.96 (95% confidence) to be significant.ResultsA total of 1001 responses were obtained, with a mean age of 44.2 years. The most prevalent comorbidities were vitamin D deficiency (63.4%), lower limb venous insufficiency (47.2%), and migraine (43.1%). Compared to the general female population in Spain, patients with lipedema were more likely to suffer from venous insufficiency (OR= 5.05; 95% CI: 4.3-5.8), urinary incontinence (OR= 4.93; 95% CI: 4.1-5.8), migraine (OR= 3.9; 95% CI: 3.4-4.5), thyroid disease (OR= 2.21; 95% CI: 1.8-2.6), and asthma (OR= 2.09; 95% CI: 1.7-2.5). However, the probability of hypertension (OR= 0.38; 95% CI: 0.2-0.4) and diabetes (OR= 0.36; 95% CI: 0.2-0.6) was significantly lower.ConclusionsSpanish women with lipedema have a higher prevalence of certain pathologies that should be considered in their medical care. Understanding these relationships is crucial to improving the detection and treatment of patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Lipedema is a chronic and progressive adipose tissue disorder characterized by the abnormal accumulation of subcutaneous fat, predominantly in the legs and occasionally in the arms. The symptom that most significantly affects the quality of life is pain. Ultrasound elastography is an imaging technology that allows for measuring tissue stiffness quantitatively. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between accompanying pain in patients with lipedema and tissue elasticity measured using shear-wave elastography (SWE). METHODS: Our study was designed as an observational, analytical and cross-sectional study. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain, while the PainDetect questionnaire was utilized to evaluate neuropathic pain. The evaluation of tissue elasticity and fibrosis was conducted using the SWE method. RESULTS: This research assessed thirty-five patients, revealing an average age of 45.2 years and an average body mass index (BMI) of 33.6 kg/m². 60% of the patients had a lipedema diagnosis in their family history. Both age (p < 0.01) and BMI (p < 0.001) values were moderately correlated with all subcutaneous adipose tissue measurements, while no correlation was observed in SWE measurements. Only the level of the thigh in the SWE-Elasticity (SWE-E) values was related to VAS (r = 0.35, p = 0.03). Additionally, PainDetect scores demonstrated significant positive correlations with both SWE-velocity (SWE-V) and SWE-E measurements in the thigh region. Specifically, SWE-V showed moderate correlations with PainDetect scores in the right thigh (r = 0.38, p = 0.02) and left thigh (r = 0.47, p = 0.004), while SWE-E was also significantly correlated in both the right (r = 0.44, p = 0.007) and left thighs (r = 0.44, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: While SWE measurements were not correlated with skin adipose tissue, SWE measurements were correlated with pain and neuropathic pain in patients with lipedema. This finding highlights a potentially important relationship between tissue elasticity and pain, which may warrant further exploration. SWE offers a novel, non-invasive approach to quantifying tissue stiffness, providing valuable insights into tissue alterations in women with lipedema.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative fibrosis is a frequent complication following liposuction for lipedema. Serrapeptase, a proteolytic enzyme with purported anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects, is used empirically, but robust evidence supporting its efficacy is lacking. This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of postoperative serrapeptase supplementation in reducing fibrosis following lower limb liposuction for lipedema. METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study included 50 female patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lipedema undergoing tumescent liposuction. Patients were allocated to either a serrapeptase group (n = 25), receiving 60,000 IU daily for 4 weeks, or a control group (n = 25) receiving standard care alone. The primary outcome was tissue stiffness measured by quantitative ultrasound elastography (QUS). Secondary outcomes included B-mode ultrasonography, patient-reported pain (VAS), and clinical assessment of induration. Evaluations were performed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 3 months. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in the primary outcome of tissue stiffness at 4 weeks (14.8 ± 3.1 kPa vs. 15.2 ± 3.0 kPa; p = 0.62) or 3 months (13.7 ± 2.9 kPa vs. 14.0 ± 3.2 kPa; p = 0.78). Similarly, no significant benefits were seen in secondary outcomes, including fibrotic changes on ultrasound, VAS pain scores, or clinical induration (p > 0.05 for all). Serrapeptase was well-tolerated with no adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Oral serrapeptase supplementation did not demonstrate measurable efficacy in preventing postoperative fibrosis or improving patient-reported outcomes following liposuction for lipedema. These findings do not support its routine use in this clinical setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

BackgroundEndothermal ablation (ETA) is a well-established treatment for chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). However, its effectiveness in patients with concomitant lipedema remains poorly described. Given the distinct pathophysiological features and symptom burden of lipedema, outcomes may differ in this subgroup.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with CVI alone and those with CVI plus lipedema. All patients underwent ETA, with adjunctive phlebectomies as indicated. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the EQ-5D-VAS and CIVIQ-20 questionnaires before surgery and at 3 months postoperatively. Demographic and clinical variables included age, body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and symptom profile. The primary outcome was the change in CIVIQ-20 score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in EQ-5D-VAS and postoperative complications (hematoma, paresthesia, superficial and deep vein thrombosis).ResultsA total of 48 patients were included (32 with CVI alone, 16 with CVI and lipedema). Preoperative QoL impairment was significantly greater in the lipedema cohort (median CIVIQ-20: 61.0 [49.5-69.5]) compared with CVI alone (46.0 [33.0-56.0], p = .001). At 3 months, both groups demonstrated significant improvement (p < .001 for within-group change). However, the magnitude of improvement was greater in CVI alone (median reduction: -13.5 [-19.5 to -5.0]) than in CVI plus lipedema (-4.0 [-7.0 to -1.5]; p = .012). Multivariable regression identified higher baseline CIVIQ-20 (β = 0.60; SE = 0.09; p < .001) and lipedema status (β = 12.44; SE = 2.43; p < .001) as independent predictors of poorer postoperative CIVIQ-20 outcomes. Paresthesia was more frequent in lipedema patients (25.0% vs 18.8% at 1 month; 12.5% vs 6.2% at 3 months).ConclusionWhile ETA significantly improves QoL in patients with CVI, those with concomitant lipedema experience smaller gains and a higher rate of postoperative paresthesia. These findings highlight the importance of setting realistic expectations and counseling lipedema patients regarding potential outcomes of venous interventions.

BackgroundLipedema is a chronic disorder involving abnormal accumulation of subcutaneous fat, primarily in the lower limbs. Liposuction is an effective treatment, but postoperative complications such as fluid retention and seroma formation are common. While the use of surgical drains is well established in other areas of plastic surgery, their role in lipedema liposuction remains unclear.MethodsThis prospective observational study involved 50 consecutive patients with stage II or III lipedema who underwent lower leg liposuction. A novel passive drainage technique was used, involving glove drains fashioned from sterile, powder-free nitrile gloves and inserted through existing liposuction incisions. Drain duration, postoperative swelling, and complications, particularly seroma formation, were evaluated.ResultsAll patients completed follow-up with no major complications. Glove drains remained in place for an average of 2.4 ± 0.5 days. Only 2 patients (4%) developed seromas requiring single aspiration. No infections, hematomas, or lymphatic complications were recorded. Patients reported reduced swelling and discomfort compared to historical cases without drains.ConclusionPassive glove drains appear to be a simple, safe, and effective method to manage postoperative fluid collections after lipedema liposuction of the lower legs. The technique may lower the risk of seroma formation and promote early recovery, characterized by reduced postoperative edema, improved patient comfort, and an uncomplicated short-term postoperative course. Further controlled studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized drainage protocols in lipedema surgery.

Review Article Background: Lipedema and advanced lymphedema are chronic disorders of adipose and lymphatic tissues that remain frequently underdiagnosed. Their coexistence poses therapeutic challenges, particularly when conservative management fails. Although international guidelines support surgical intervention in selected cases, real-world data from resourcelimited hospital settings remain scarce. Objective: To report the experience of a Moroccan tertiary university hospital in the surgical management of advanced lipedema and lymphedema and to compare clinical outcomes with current international recommendations. Methods: A retrospective descriptive case series was conducted between 2021 and 2024. Three patients underwent surgical treatment using tumescent liposuction or en bloc tissue resection with skin grafting. Postoperative outcomes were assessed clinically and through a structured quality-of-life questionnaire inspired by the SF-36, focusing on pain, mobility, and overall satisfaction. Results: All procedures were completed without intraoperative or postoperative complications. The volume of aspirated adipose tissue ranged from 2.1 to 4.0 L. One patient with advanced secondary lymphedema required surgical resection, with evacuation of 1.2 L of lymphorrhea. Postoperative satisfaction ranged from moderate to high, with reported quality-of-life scores between 5 and 8 out of 10. These findings are consistent with outcomes reported in recent international series. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of advanced lipedema and lymphedema is feasible, safe, and clinically beneficial, even in resource-limited settings. An individualized, guideline-based approach allows satisfactory functional and quality-of-life outcomes. Further prospective studies with standardized assessment tools are required.

INTRODUCTION: Lipedema causes abnormal fat accumulation in the limbs, leading to pain, functional impairment, and body image disturbance. Nowadays, various liposuction techniques are available. The wet technique is increasingly being considered as the gold standard; however, comparative data between the dry and wet methods remain limited. We evaluated the efficacy of liposuction and compared outcomes between dry and wet approaches. Our analysis focused on surgical characteristics, complication rates, and clinical outcomes including pain relief, functional improvement, and esthetic satisfaction, with comparisons made between preoperative and 12-month postoperative results. METHODS: Besides surgical data extraction, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained through three different standardized questionnaires to assess pain relief, function gain, and esthetic satisfaction. RESULTS: Both techniques were effective, demonstrating overall improvements in pain, function, and body image, when comparing pre and postoperative outcomes. Lipoaspirate volumes were comparable between the groups. Operative time was significantly shorter in the wet technique group. Short-term complication rates did not differ between dry and wet techniques. While both techniques led to a global improvement, the wet technique showed greater potential in pain reduction and better esthetics satisfaction 12 months post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Lipedema is a complex disease that is still poorly understood. Liposuction may offer symptomatic relief regardless of the technique used, but the wet technique demonstrates better postoperative results, with improved PROMs and fewer complications. The treatment of lipedema requires a multidisciplinary approach, while conservative therapy remains the first-line option, surgical treatment by wet liposuction should be considered for its significant potential in improving functional outcomes and as an effective therapeutic option.