Your search

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the frequency of probable lipedema among women with lower extremity pain (LEP) using a validated screening questionnaire and to examine its associations with neuropathic pain (NP) characteristics, functional status, psychological symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).MethodsThis prospective questionnaire-based case-control study included 133 women, comprising 68 women with LEP and 65 age-matched healthy controls. Participants were evaluated using the Lipedema Screening Questionnaire (LSQ), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), PainDETECT questionnaire, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). An LSQ score of ≥8 was classified as probable lipedema, whereas a score of ≥12 was classified as high-probability lipedema. These categories indicate screening probability rather than a confirmed clinical diagnosis of lipedema. Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and multivariable regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with LSQ and LEFS scores.ResultsWomen with LEP had significantly higher LSQ scores and a greater proportion of probable lipedema (36.8% vs 12.3%, p = .001) and high-probability lipedema (19.1% vs 3.1%, p = .003) than controls. Compared with controls, women with LEP had poorer lower extremity function, greater anxiety symptoms, more prominent NP characteristics, and lower physical and mental HRQoL scores (all p < .05). Higher LSQ scores were positively correlated with PainDETECT scores (r = 0.446, p < .001), whereas pain intensity was not significantly correlated with the evaluated clinical outcomes. In multivariable linear regression, PainDETECT score was independently associated with LSQ score (β = 0.382, p = .004). For functional status, both the SF-12 physical (β = 0.352, p = .001) and mental component scores (β = 0.362, p = .002) were independently associated with LEFS scores.ConclusionsProbable lipedema was more frequently identified by LSQ among women with LEP than among healthy controls. NP characteristics were independently associated with greater lipedema-related symptom burden, whereas lower extremity function was independently associated with both physical and mental HRQoL. These findings support the use of lipedema and NP screening as complementary components of the clinical assessment of women with LEP. However, LSQ findings should not be interpreted as a clinical diagnosis of lipedema and require confirmation through appropriate clinical assessment.

Background/Objectives: Lipedema is an adipose tissue disorder associated with body-related burden. This study compared orthorexic eating tendencies between women with and without lipedema and examined associations with body-shape concern and psychological symptoms. Methods: This controlled cross-sectional study included 44 women with lipedema and 44 women without lipedema. Participants completed the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS), Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Associated variables were examined using multiple linear regression. Results: Women with lipedema had higher DOS scores than women without lipedema (25.07 ± 6.55 vs. 20.48 ± 5.05; Cohen's d = 0.79; p < 0.001). BSQ, HADS-Anxiety, and HADS-Depression scores were also higher in the lipedema group (all p ≤ 0.001). DOS and BSQ scores were positively correlated in both groups. In the multivariable model, which included group status, age, BMI, BSQ, HADS-A, and HADS-D scores, BSQ score was independently associated with DOS score (B = 0.067; 95% CI 0.025-0.108; p = 0.002), whereas group status and the other covariates were not. The model's adjusted R2 was 0.234. Conclusions: Women with lipedema exhibited greater orthorexic eating tendencies, body-shape concern, and psychological symptoms than controls. Body-shape concern was independently associated with orthorexic eating tendencies. The group difference in DOS scores is largely explained by the higher BSQ scores accompanying lipedema; this should not be interpreted as indicating that lipedema is unrelated to orthorexic tendencies. These findings support consideration of body image when addressing eating behavior in lipedema care.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a prevalent chronic condition in women, characterized by a painful and symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue primarily in the lower limbs. Its diagnosis is based on specific clinical characteristics; however, these characteristics lack robust scientific validation. Furthermore, lipedema is frequently misdiagnosed as obesity. This study aims to compare quality of life and physical and psychological characteristics between patients with obesity with and without lipedema. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 30 patients with obesity and lipedema (Lip-Obes group) and 29 patients with only obesity (nonLip-Obes group). Quality of life, body composition (BMI, fat free mass, fat mass, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, leg volume), pain (pain pattern, pressure pain thresholds, pain interference, pain distribution, symptoms of neuropathic pain), physical functioning (hand grip strength, quadriceps strength, functional exercise capacity, functional mobility and physical activity level), and psychosocial functioning (pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety, and stress, body image dissatisfaction, self-efficacy, and eating difficulties) were assessed using clinical measurements and self-reported outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Compared to the nonLip-Obes group, the Lip-Obes group showed greater impairments in quality of life (p < 0.05). Despite similar body composition variables, the Lip-Obes group had lower waist-to-hip, waist-to-height, upper leg-to-waist, and lower leg-to-waist ratios, as well as higher total limb volume than the nonLip-Obes group. Additionally, the Lip-Obes group reported higher pain intensity, lower pressure pain thresholds in the arms and legs, and greater pain interference than the nonLip-Obes group (p < 0.05). Although hand-grip strength and physical activity levels were comparable, the Lip-Obes group exhibited lower quadriceps strength, functional exercise capacity, and functional mobility (p < 0.05). Additionally, the Lip-Obes group reported higher pain catastrophizing, greater body image dissatisfaction, and more severe eating difficulties than the nonLip-Obes group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in depression, anxiety, stress, or self-efficacy between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional study highlights the complex nature of lipedema, providing preliminary evidence of differences in quality of life and distinct body composition and physical and physiological characteristics between patients with obesity with and without lipedema. These results emphasize the need for further research to identify diagnostic biomarkers for lipedema through in-depth investigations. Future studies should also focus on developing and optimizing a multidisciplinary treatment approach tailored to the unique characteristics of patients with lipedema.

BACKGROUND: Women with lipedema have an abnormal accumulation of adipose tissue that leads to pain and reduced quality of life (QoL). The impact of lipedema on body image and QoL remains largely unknown. The aim of this study is to explore Health-Related QoL (HR-QoL) and body image in women with lipedema and compare it to healthy women without lipedema as well as women with advanced cancer. METHODS: This comparative study included women with lipedema (n = 104), healthy women without lipedema (healthy controls) (n = 42), and an exploratory group of women with advanced cancer (n = 44). HR-QoL was assessed using RAND-36, body image concern was evaluated with the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), and symptoms were assessed with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). RESULTS: In total, 190 women were included. Women with lipedema had significantly lower HR-QoL compared to healthy women without lipedema across all eight dimensions (p < 0.001). Women with lipedema had HR-QoL scores comparable to those of women with advanced cancer in four dimensions: physical functioning, bodily pain, and emotional problems. In the general health dimension, women with lipedema had even lower scores than women with advanced cancer (p < 0.05). Body image concerns were significantly greater in the lipedema group than in healthy controls (p = 0.001). Women with lipedema experienced significantly more symptoms than healthy controls, including more pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, loss of appetite, dyspnea and reduced QoL (<0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: Women with lipedema had as low HR-QoL as women with advanced cancer in several dimensions, significant body image concerns and high symptom burden. These findings underscore the need to develop targeted health care initiatives for these patients.

Lipedema is still a little-known disease, and the internet and social networks have been increasing the identification of many people with the condition, its characteristics, and diagnostic criteria. It is a disease of the adipose tissue that causes changes in body shape in the regions of the body's extremities, hips, and thighs. Classification of lipedema is based on the distribution of adipose tissue and severity of the disease (stages I, II, III, and IV) [ [1] ]. Lymphedema, venous disease, and hypermobile joints are co-morbidities [ [2] ]. Its overlap with overweight and obesity is common. Also, weight fluctuations and metabolic changes stem from body dissatisfaction commonly affecting women.

Background/Aim: YouTube provides information on several health-conditions including lipedema. The aim of this study was to investigate the properties, quality, and quantity of YouTube videos on lipedema. Methods: We explored YouTube using the key word lipedema and the initial top 50 videos were included to review. The properties comprising informers, target, and domains of videos covering number of views, likes, dislikes, duration, viewing rate (VR), and video power index (VPI) were recorded. A modified DISCERN tool and global quality scale (GQS) were used to assess the reliability and quality of videos, respectively. Results: The top 50 videos had a mean of 35,805 views, 282 likes, 12 dislikes, and 30 comments. The mean VPI (96.4) and VR (63.8%) were high. The videos were generally uploaded by health professionals for patient/public and health professional targets with the same ratio (50%). The majority of video contents was related to general information (68%) followed by surgical treatment (62%). Only a small ratio of their content (22%) was about nonsurgical management. The reliability and quality of the videos were intermediate to low. The median DISCERN and GQS scores were higher in the videos uploaded by health professional group compared with nonhealth professionals, but the number of views, VPI, and VR were similar between the groups with regard to the source. Conclusion: YouTube videos on lipedema are mostly provided by health professionals targeting both public/patients and health care providers but the content is limited and the quality and reliability of them were low to intermediate. Therefore, the lipedema specialists are suggested to work together to create up-to-date, high-quality, accessible online educational content to meet the needs of both patients/public and the health professionals. In addition, control mechanisms and careful peer reviewing of the videos informed by nonhealth professionals are warranted to avoid misleading information.

PURPOSE: Lipoedema is a progressive adipose (fat) disorder, and little is known about its psychological effect. This study aimed to determine the experiences of physical and mental health and health care across stages of lipoedema. METHODS: Cross-sectional, secondary data from an anonymous survey (conducted 2014-2015) in Dutch and English in those with self-reported lipoedema were used (N = 1,362, Mdnage = 41-50 years old, 80.2% diagnosed). χ2 analyses of categorical data assessed lipoedema stage groups 'Stage 1-2' (N = 423), 'Stages 3-4' (N = 474) and 'Stage Unknown' (N = 406) experiences of health (physical and psychological), and health care. RESULTS: Compared to 'Stage 1-2', 'Stage 3-4' reported more loss of mobility (p =  < .001), pain (p =  < .001), fatigue (p = .002), problems at work (p =  < .001) and were seeking treatment to improve physical functioning (p =  < .001) more frequently. 'Stage 3-4' were more likely to report their GP did not have knowledge of lipoedema, did not take them seriously, gave them diet and lifestyle advice, dismissed lipoedema, and treated them 'badly' due to overweight/lipoedema compared to 'Stage 1-2' (p =  < .001). 'Stage 3-4' were more likely to report depression (p =  < .001), emotional lability (p = .033) eating disorders (p = .018) and feeling lonelier, more fearful, and stayed at home more (p =  < .001) and less likely to have visited a psychologist (p =  < .001) compared to 'Stage 1-2'. CONCLUSIONS: A divergent pattern of physical and psychological experiences between lipoedema stages reflects physical symptom differences and differences in psychological symptoms and health care experiences. These findings increase the understanding of lipoedema symptoms to inform psychological supports for women with lipoedema in navigating chronic health care management.

Lipoedema, an adipose tissue disorder, is a poorly visible, often unrecognised condition. To foster a greater understanding of the significant and debilitating impacts faced by women living with lipoedema, the charity Lipoedema UK conducted four focus group interviews, the findings of which were published in a series of reports under the umbrella title 'Women in dire need'. The reports identified the substantial and numerous negative effects of lipoedema on the women's everyday lives, including the patients' experiences with compression garments, the effects of liposuction surgery (many of which were not positive), the everyday impacts ranging from pain and reduced mobility to poor self-esteem and working prospects, and the considerable challenges faced by women with late-stage lipoedema which can render them immobile.

BACKGROUND: Although a large number of adult women worldwide are affected by lipedema, the physiologic conditions triggering onset and progression of this chronic disease remain enigmatic. In the present study, a descriptive epidemiologic situation of postoperative lipedema patients is presented. METHODS: The authors developed an online survey questionnaire for lipedema patients in Germany. The survey was conducted on 209 female patients who had been diagnosed with lipedema and had undergone tumescent liposuction. RESULTS: Most of the participants (average age, 38.5 years) had noticed a first manifestation of the disease at the age of 16. It took a mean of 15 years to accomplish diagnosis. Liposuction led to a significant reduction of pain, swelling, tenderness, and easy bruising as confirmed by the majority of patients. Hypothyroidism [n = 75 (35.9 percent) and depression [n = 48 (23.0 percent)] occurred at a frequency far beyond the average prevalence in the German population. The prevalence of diabetes type 1 [n = 3 (1.4 percent)], and diabetes type 2 [n = 2 (1 percent)] was particularly low among the respondents. Forty-seven of the lipedema patients (approximately 22.5 percent) suffered from a diagnosed migraine. Following liposuction, the frequency and/or intensity of migraine attacks became markedly reduced, as stated by 32 patients (68.1 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life increases significantly after surgery with a reduction of pain and swelling and decreased tendency to easy bruising. The high prevalence of hypothyroidism in lipedema patients could be related to the frequently observed lipedema-associated obesity. The low prevalence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension appears to be a specific characteristic distinguishing lipedema from lifestyle-induced obesity.