Your search

Lipoedema is a loose connective tissue disease primarily affecting women characterized by an abnormal build-up of painful fat in the legs and arms. In healthcare, lipoedema is often confused with obesity, and today, diagnostic tools and standardized guidelines for adequate treatments are lacking. Still, research on how affected women manage their health problems and whether they are satisfied with their care remains sparse. Therefore, this study aimed to contribute knowledge on healthcare experiences, and their use and self-reported effects of self-care and treatments among women with lipoedema.

Lipedema is characterized by fat accumulation in the limbs, sparing the trunk, hands, and feet. Its etiology remains uncertain, but may be related to genetic and female hormones. Several theories suggest an association with chronic inflammation and fibrosis. Pain, spontaneous bruising, and increased diameter of the affected areas are the most frequent signs and symptoms. Diagnosis is primarily clinical, but frequently supported by imaging techniques, including ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate lipedema from other similar conditions. This study retrospectively analyzed ultrasonographic images of 34 female patients, clinically diagnosed with lipedema and correlated structural patterns with different stages of inflammation and fibrosis in the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. The images were obtained in 2024 using high-frequency linear transducers (12 - 15 MHz). The findings enabled the identification of potentially characteristic changes for the development of a classification that may assist in diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of this condition. However, while ultrasonography has already been incorporated into routine medical practice to investigate lipedema, prospective and comparative multicenter studies that correlate ultrasound findings with the clinical stage of the disease are necessary to validate the applicability of this approach.

This study underscores the need for tailored self-management interventions for people with lipoedema. The adaptation of existing self-management strategies from other chronic conditions should take into account the specific needs, barriers, and facilitators of people with lipoedema and their HCPs.

Background: Despite its estimated high prevalence among women and increasing awareness, lipedema remains under-investigated. Ignoring its debilitating nature, surgical treatment for this condition is frequently covered by health insurance only in advanced stages and after the exhaustion of conservative therapies. Methods: A total of 1015 patients with lipedema were recruited via social media platforms. Of these, 860 patients provided answers to at least one complete section of the modified Body-Q questionnaire (response rate 85%). The Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were utilized to assess the impact of the surgical treatment by means of patient-reported outcomes on the self-perception of various body areas. Results: The satisfaction scores among conservatively treated patients for abdominal appearance, arms, back, body, buttocks, and inner thighs showed a statistically significant decline with increasing stages of lipedema. The comparison of patient evaluation scores in the appearance domain demonstrated better patient self-perception scores in patients who received at least one session of the surgical treatment for the hips and thighs (p < 0.01), inner thighs (p < 0.01), and excess skin (0.01) scales. On the body scale, the patients who underwent liposuction again reported better satisfaction scores; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.081). In the health-related quality of life domain, the patients who received liposuction treatment reported a better outcome in the body image (p < 0.01), physical function (p = 0.05), physical symptoms (p = 0.04), and psychological function (p < 0.01) scales. Conclusions: The current study underscores the burden of lipedema of affected patients and its negative impact on self-perception. As the disease progresses, conservatively treated patients experience a decline in satisfaction with various aspects of their appearance. However, surgical interventions, particularly liposuction, does not address esthetic concerns but significantly improve health-related quality of life across multiple domains, emphasizing the comprehensive benefits of surgical intervention in the management of lipedema.

DiVA portal is a finding tool for research publications and student theses written at the following 50 universities and research institutions.

Liposuction has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative in patients with lipedema. It positively impacts clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

<span><b>Background:</b> Lipedema is a subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder mainly affecting women. Its progressive nature often requires high-volume liposuction for efficient pain reduction. However, aspiration volumes of more than 5 L within a single session may lead to a variety of complications. Thus,</span> …

This study explored experienced weight stigma, internalised weight bias and depressive symptom severity in lipoedema, a chronic health condition that primarily affects women and involves painful and disproportionate adipose tissue. This study utilised an international cross-sectional online survey i …

Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects 537 million people as of 2021, and is projected to rise to 783 million by 2045. This positions DM as the ninth leading cause of death globally. Among DM patients, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality. Notably, the prevalence rate …

<p>The average values of CR-PCSS (T1), CR-PCSS (T2) and CR-PCSS (T3) over all participants were 2.22±0.82, 1.18±0.77, and 0.84±0.77, respectively, which corresponded to the skin improvement between T1 and T2 of 0.93±0.27 (p < 0.0001) as well as between T1 and T3 of 1.38±0.47 (p < 0.0001). Assessm</p> …

Routine cold-water immersion (CWI) is typically suggested to reduce inflammation, a hallmark property of lipedema. Lipedema is a connective tissue disorder with a genetic component that presents with a disproportionate distribution of nodules in the extremities. This case report explores the impact …

This case report explores the use of radio electric asymmetric conveyor (REAC) technology for chronic pain management, functional limitations, and metabolic dysfunction in a 67-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis, advanced lipedema, and ...

Introduction Lipoedema is a congenital fat distribution disorder. It leads to a pathological increase in adipose tissue due to a hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the adipocytes. Currently, the disease affects about 10% of women. A common treatment of the disease is liposuction to remove the pathologic fat cells. Patients and Methods A total of 47 patients (mean age: 62.00 ± 12.96 years) were treated with the conventional tumescent liposuction and 25 patients (mean age of 45.16 ± 12.87 years) with Waterjet-assisted liposuction (WAL), a gentle, tissue-conserving method which washes out fat cells. WAL is thought to cause less damage to surrounding tissue than tumescent liposuction and thus, less trauma. Results The postoperative level the C-reactive protein was significantly (p* = 0.0195) lower after WAL treatment, implying a lower inflammation level than after tumescent liposuction. Also, a decrease of electrolytes such as potassium in the blood serum was observed in some cases. The postoperative potassium level dropped by 0.30 ± 0.24mmol/l, a value which was significantly lower in WAL treated patients where the level dropped by 0.47 ± 0.31mmol/l. The mean fat aspirate using the conventional tumescent method was 3,302.13 ± 1,345.89ml and 3,727.08 ± 151.96ml with the WAL treatment. Conclusions: WAL is a tissue-conserving method that washes out fat cells with less trauma to surrounding tissue as observed with conventional tumescent liposuction. WAL causes a lower inflammation level but higher loss of potassium ions. This latter aspect needs attention after the liposuction treatment.

Background:  Lower limb swelling presents a diagnostic challenge with diverse causes, including well-known issues like venous insufficiency and lymphedema, and less-understood conditions like lipedema. Lipedema, involving abnormal fat accumulation in the lower extremities, is frequently misdiagnosed, posing challenges for affected individuals. This research aimed to report and analyze the clinical features of patients presenting with the complaint of lipedema. Methods:  A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia from April to November 2023, involving adult patients from a specialized clinic in lipedema and lymphedema management. Data were collected through clinical evaluation and a comprehensive data collection sheet. Results:  In a cohort of 115 female patients (mean age: 38.58), the most common age for disease onset was around 20–29 years. Physical examinations revealed symmetric enlargement (88%), collar sign (43%), orthostatic nonpitting edema (49%), and telangiectasia (64%). Varicose veins were present in 36%, Stemmer signs in 2%, and foot edema in 13%. Clinical diagnosis with lipedema occurred in 71%, with grade 2 (31%) as the most common severity and type 3 (47%) as the prevalent disease type. Conclusions:  The current study, the first of its kind in the Middle East and specifically in Saudi Arabia, emphasizes the urgency of increased awareness and intervention due to a high underdiagnosis rate in lipedema. The observed complexity in symptoms and correlations between severity, lymphatic impairment, and body mass index underscore lipedema’s multifaceted nature. Future research should explore regional and cultural influences and conduct larger studies to validate and recognize various lipedema features.

Introduction Lipedema is a relatively common, frequently misdiagnosed, chronic condition often treated by liposuction when conservative therapies fail. Techniques such as traditional tumescent liposuction (TTL), power-assisted liposuction (PAL), and water-jet-assisted liposuction (WAL), are popular surgical interventions, although it is unclear how these techniques compare. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of liposuction in patients with lipedema. Methods Relevant English lipedema studies published in PubMed from January 2003 to April 2023 were identified. Ten articles with postoperative outcomes and complications data were included (2 TTL, 5 PAL, 1 WAL, 2 articles used both PAL and WAL). Results were summarized using descriptive statistics, and a randomized effects model was used to evaluate heterogeneity. Results A total of 2,542 procedures in 906 patients were included. Combined outcomes for all techniques significantly improved pain, bruising, edema, tension, pressure sensitivity, cosmetic impairment, and general impairment (all P < 0.00001). Results for TTL, PAL, and WAL led to significant improvements in pain reduction (P = 0.0005), bruising, swelling, pressure sensitivity, or cosmetic impairment (all P < 0.05). WAL more effectively reduced tension and general impairment (all P < 0.005), but heterogeneity for these outcomes was high. Overall complication rates were low for studies that utilized TTL (1.5%), PAL (4.0%), WAL (0%), and both PAL and WAL (2.3%). Conclusion Liposuction techniques, including TTL, PAL, and WAL, result in significant symptom improvement in lipedema patients with a relatively low complication rate. WAL may potentially result in a more substantial reduction of tension and general impairment with fewer complications; however, only a single study performed this method of liposuction exclusively. This is the first meta-analysis investigating liposuction data in lipedema treatment.

The validated Dutch translation showed high values for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity, which allows us to implement the questionnaire in the early detection of LEL after gynecological cancer treatment.

<p id="p1">Despite extensive research during the last couple of years, lipedema still appears enigmatic in respect to its pathogenesis. In our in vitro study, we have set out to further characterize lipedema adipocytes, concentrating on gene and protein expression, which might help to develop ideas explaining the excessive accumulation of adipose tissue in women with lipedema. Using 2D cultures we show that gene expression in lipedema and non-lipedema adipocytes differs significantly in terms of genes related to lipid droplet size determination, insulin signaling and glucose uptake. A pronounced hypertrophy, recognizable by a significantly increased average lipid droplet size, was visible in differentiated lipedema adipocytes grown in 3D cultures. In addition, gene and protein expression related to inflammation and fibrosis were upregulated in lipedema adipocytes compared to controls, supporting earlier reports. Taken together, results from our in vitro studies suggest that lipedema adipose cells are capable of retaining their hypertrophic nature under culture conditions and open new aspects focusing on insulin signaling and PDGFRA-mediated balancing of adipogenic versus fibrogenic differentiation of lipedema adipose tissue.</p>

Lipedema and lymphedema are physically similar yet distinct diseases that are commonly misdiagnosed. We previously reported that lipedema and lymphedema are associated with increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The underlying etiology of the prothrombotic profile observed in lipedema and lymphedema is unclear, but may be related to alterations in platelets. Our objective was to analyze the platelet transcriptome to identify biological pathways that may provide insight into platelet activation and thrombosis. The platelet transcriptome was evaluated in patients with lymphedema and lipedema, then compared to control subjects with obesity. Patients with lipedema were found to have a divergent transcriptome from patients with lymphedema. The platelet transcriptome and impacted biological pathways in lipedema were surprisingly similar to weight-matched comparators, yet different when compared to overweight individuals with a lower body mass index (BMI). Differences in the platelet transcriptome for patients with lipedema and lymphedema were found in biological pathways required for protein synthesis and degradation, as well as metabolism. Key differences in the platelet transcriptome for patients with lipedema compared to BMI-matched subjects involved metabolism and glycosaminoglycan processing. These inherent differences in the platelet transcriptome warrant further investigation, and may contribute to the increased risk of thrombosis in patients with lipedema and lymphedema.

Abstract Background Lipedema is a chronic, incurable disorder characterized by painful fat accumulation in the extremities. While the application of liposuction in lipedema management has become increasingly popular, the safety and effectiveness of this approach remain contentious. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess various liposuction modalities in lipedema management to verify their safety and efficacy. Methods In-line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a comprehensive literature review from inception until March 2023 using the following electronic databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. Results From the 562 initially identified articles, 20 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria for evaluation. Our review encompassed 14 prospective cohort studies, 3 retrospective studies, 2 case series, and 1 cross-sectional study. A meta-analysis of nine articles revealed a notable improvement in the quality of life, pain, pressure sensitivity, bruising, cosmetic impairment, heaviness, walking difficulty, and itching among lipedema patients who underwent liposuction. Although complications such as inflammation, thrombosis, seroma, hematoma, and lymphedema-related skin changes were reported, severe complications were rare. Crucially, no instances of shock, recurrence, or mortality were reported. Conclusion Liposuction is a safe and beneficial therapeutic intervention for managing lipedema symptoms and enhancing quality of life. However, the impact of liposuction on secondary lymphedema remains unreported in the literature. Further high-quality, large-scale trials are necessary to assess the safety and effectiveness of different liposuction modalities. These studies will contribute valuable insights to optimize liposuction as a therapeutic option for individuals with lipedema. Level of Evidence I, risk/prognostic study.

Lipedema is a chronic, idiopathic, and painful disease characterized by an excess of adipose tissue in the extremities. The goal of this study is to characterize the gene expression of estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ), G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), and ER-metabolizing enzymes: hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase (HSD17B1, 7, B12), cytochrome P450 (CYP19A1), hormone-sensitive lipase (LIPE), enzyme steroid sulfatase (STS), and estrogen sulfotransferase (SULT1E1), which are markers in Body Mass Index (BMI) and age-matched non-lipedema (healthy) and lipedema ASCs and spheroids. Flow cytometry and cellular proliferation assays, RT-PCR, and Western Blot techniques were used to determine the expression of ERs and estrogen-metabolizing enzymes. In 2D monolayer culture, estrogen increased the proliferation and the expression of the mesenchymal marker, CD73, in hormone-depleted (HD) healthy ASCs compared to lipedema ASCs. The expression of ERβ was significantly increased in HD lipedema ASCs and spheroids compared to corresponding healthy cells. In contrast, ERα and GPER gene expression was significantly decreased in estrogen-treated lipedema spheroids. CYP19A1 and LIPE gene expressions were significantly increased in estrogen-treated healthy ASCs and spheroids, respectively, while estrogen upregulated the expression of PPAR-ϒ2 and ERα in estrogen-treated lipedema-differentiated adipocytes and spheroids. These results indicate that estrogen may play a role in adipose tissue dysregulation in lipedema.