Your search

Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the lipedema screening questionnaire - Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Background:Lipedema is a chronic connective tissue disorder characterized by painful subcutaneous adipose accumulation, mainly in the lower extremities. Pain is a hallmark feature, yet its mechanisms remain poorly defined. Neuropathic components may contribute, but direct comparisons with lymphedema are scarce.Methods:In this exploratory cross-sectional study, 118 female patients with lipedema (n = 62) or bilateral lower extremity lymphedema (n = 56) were assessed. Pain intensity was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Neuropathic pain was evaluated with painDETECT and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS). Psychological status was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), cognitive–emotional aspects with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and health-related quality of life with the WHOQOL-BREF.Results:Lipedema patients reported higher pain severity (VAS 6.2 ± 1.4 vs. 5.5 ± 1.5, p = 0.02) and greater neuropathic pain prevalence (42% vs. 21%, p < 0.01) than lymphedema. painDETECT and LANSS scores were significantly higher in lipedema (p < 0.001). HADS-Anxiety (10.2 ± 3.8 vs. 7.8 ± 3.5, p = 0.005) and PCS scores (29.5 ± 7.2 vs. 25.4 ± 6.5, p = 0.03) were also elevated, while HADS-Depression was slightly higher in lymphedema without significance. WHOQOL-BREF scores were similarly reduced in both groups compared to population norms. Correlation analyses showed strong associations between pain intensity, neuropathic features, catastrophizing, and anxiety, particularly in lipedema.Conclusions:A substantial proportion of lipedema patients exhibit neuropathic pain features and higher pain severity compared with lymphedema, while anxiety and pain catastrophizing appear to amplify symptom burden; however, quality-of-life impairment is substantial in both conditions, and the findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating with implications for more individualized management approaches.

Objectives: To examine the associations of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption, dietary inflammatory index (DII), and Mediterranean diet adherence with pain severity, physical quality of life, body composition, and inflammatory markers in women with lipedema. Methods: This cross-sectional study included women diagnosed with lipedema across different disease stages. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire, and foods were classified according to the NOVA system to determine UPF consumption. The dietary inflammatory index was calculated to assess the inflammatory potential of the diet, and Mediterranean diet adherence was evaluated using a standardized scoring system. Anthropometric measurements, body composition parameters, inflammatory markers, pain intensity (VAS), and physical quality of life (SF-12 PCS) were assessed. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between dietary variables and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 86 women with lipedema (stage 1: n=36, stage 2: n=33, stage 3: n=17) were included. UPF consumption increased from 28.1% to 41.3% of total energy and DII scores from +1.46 to +3.02 across stages, while Mediterranean diet adherence decreased from 28.2 to 21.3. In parallel, BMI increased from 27.1 to 31.1 kg/m² and body fat percentage from 36.7% to 41.1%. Inflammatory markers also rose across stages (hs-CRP: 3.9 to 6.1 mg/L; IL-6: 3.1 to 4.6 pg/mL). In multivariable models, higher DII scores were associated with increased pain severity (β=0.29, p=0.007) and higher hs-CRP levels (β=0.41, p<0.001), whereas Mediterranean diet adherence was positively associated with physical quality of life (β=0.34, p=0.002). Conclusion: Higher ultra-processed food consumption and dietary inflammatory potential were associated with increased inflammation, pain, and adiposity, whereas greater Mediterranean diet adherence was associated with better physical quality of life in women with lipedema.

INTRODUCTION: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate fat deposition, primarily in the lower extremities, leading to pain, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. While Power-Assisted Liposuction (PAL) is the standard surgical approach, the integration of Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction (UAL) with PAL has been proposed to enhance fat removal and improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy, postoperative outcomes, and complication rates of PAL alone versus UAL + PAL in patients with Stage II and III lipedema. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 60 female patients diagnosed with lipedema (Stage II and III). 30 patients underwent PAL alone, while 30 received UAL followed by PAL. Primary outcomes included the volume of fat aspirated, circumferential reduction, and postoperative pain, measured at multiple time points over a 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes assessed patient satisfaction, time to return to daily activities, and complication rates. RESULTS: The UAL + PAL group demonstrated a significantly higher mean fat extraction volume (5,500 ± 450 mL) compared to the PAL group (4,100 ± 380 mL; p < 0.01). Circumferential reduction was greater in the UAL + PAL group, with an average reduction of 12.5 cm versus 8.2 cm in the PAL group (p < 0.01). Postoperative pain, assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), was significantly lower in the UAL + PAL group (VAS 4.5 ± 0.7) compared to the PAL group (VAS 6.2 ± 0.8 at 24 hours post-surgery; p < 0.01). Additionally, patients treated with UAL + PAL reported a faster return to daily activities (9.3 ± 1.8 days vs. 12.8 ± 2.1 days; p < 0.01) and higher satisfaction scores (4.8 ± 0.5 vs. 4.2 ± 0.6 on a 5-point Likert scale; p < 0.05). Complication rates were comparable between the two groups, with no major adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: UAL + PAL offers significant advantages over PAL alone in the surgical management of lipedema, providing superior fat removal, reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and improved patient satisfaction. These findings support the integration of UAL into standard liposuction protocols for advanced-stage lipedema, emphasizing its efficacy in overcoming the challenges posed by fibrotic adipose tissue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Background Lipoedema is a condition of abnormal accumulation of painful adipose tissue, usually in the lower body of women. The disproportionate subcutaneous adipose tissue may negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There are currently no patient reported outcome measures (PROM) specifically designed to assess the HRQoL in individuals with lipoedema. The aim of this study was to compare scores on validated lower limb lymphoedema PROMs between females with lipoedema and lymphoedema. Methods In a private lymphoedema clinic in Australia between 1 October 2021 and 22 August 2023, individuals assigned female at birth, aged 18 years and older who consented to the entry of de-identified data into a research databank and completed the Lymphoedema Quality of Life tool (LYMQOL-leg) and/or Lymphoedema Symptoms Intensity and Distress Survey (LSIDS-L) for the legs were included in this study. Between group analysis was conducted on 151 participants who were either diagnosed with lipoedema (N = 90) or bilateral leg lymphoedema (N = 61). Participants with both conditions were excluded. Results Participants with lipoedema reported significantly higher burden scores for symptoms (p = 0.003), appearance (p = 0.003) and mood (p = 0.011) in the LYMQOL-leg survey when compared to participants with bilateral leg lymphoedema. Participants with lipoedema also reported significantly worse LSIDS-L scores for neurological sensation (p = 0.003), biobehavioral (p = 0.016) and resource (p = 0.008) questions compared to participants with lymphoedema. Conclusions This study highlights that although females with lipoedema and lymphoedema experience similar symptoms, their experiences differ in specific outcomes that influence their HRQoL. These findings warrant further investigation into the HRQoL concerns of individuals with lipoedema.

Introduction: Lipedema, a painful disease that almost exclusively affects women, leads to an excessive accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue, primarily in the extremities. Morphologically, it is characterized by hyperplasia and hypertrophy of adipocytes as well as by inflammation-associated cells and fibrosis. Limited knowledge exists regarding the background of adipocyte pathology. In the present study, we aimed to identify morphological alterations of lipedema adipocytes, which could cause functional implications in lipedema adipose tissue. Methods: Approximately 3000 adipocytes from nine lipedema and five control adipose tissue samples, originating from non-obese donors, were analyzed. The ratio of atypical nuclei (Lochkerne) in relation to the total amount of nuclei was assessed and compared between lipedema and non-lipedema samples. Results: Lipedema adipose tissue exhibits a significantly higher proportion of Lochkerne compared to controls (p=0.001). While 24% of adipocyte nuclei presented as Lochkerne in lipedema samples, only 3% were identifiable in controls. We further show that the process of Lochkern-formation involves the nuclear indentation by small lipid droplets and their subsequent transmigration through the nucleus towards the central lipid content. Conclusion: The significantly increased occurrence of lipoma-associated Lochkerne in lipedema adipose tissue compared to controls reveals that, from a morphological point of view, lipedema is a form of lipomatosis.

Lipedema is a lipodystrophic disease characterized primarily by a disproportionate increase in lower body subcutaneous fat. Although moderate weight loss decreases lower body fat mass in women with obesity and lipedema, it is possible that this decrease is due to a reduction in normal subcutaneous fat, rather than lipedema-affected fat. We evaluated the effect of moderate (11%) diet-induced weight loss on body fat mass and distribution, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging, in a 56-year-old woman with lipedema who was normal weight (body mass index: 23.9 kg/m2) at baseline. Approximately 85% of the decrease in body weight comprised body fat. The relative reduction in upper body fat (abdominal subcutaneous, arm and trunk fat) was similar to the relative reduction in lower body (total leg fat and thigh subcutaneous fat). Accordingly, weight loss did not change the proportion of total body fat comprising leg fat (44.8% and 45.1% before and after weight loss, respectively) or arm fat (9.1% and 9.6% before and after weight loss, respectively). These data suggest weight loss decreases lipedema-affected adipose tissue and demonstrate the therapeutic effect of weight loss on body composition in women with lipedema even if they are normal weight.

Introduction & Objectives Lipedema is a chronic and underdiagnosed adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate lower limb fat distribution, pain, and edema. Despite increasing awareness, diagnostic uncertainty persists due to heterogeneous semiological definitions and limited attention to the patient's subjective experience. Methodology This study aims to explore how patients with lipedema verbally represent their symptoms and bodily sensations, and how these narratives correlate with established semiological criteria. By analyzing spontaneous language, we seek to identify potential linguistic markers that could enhance diagnostic characterization and favor earlier recognition of the condition. We conducted an observational, multicenter qualitative study involving adult women with clinically confirmed lipedema. Semi-structured interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Lexical and semantic analyses were performed using natural language processing software and manual thematic categorization. Semiological assessment included tissue consistency, pain distribution, symmetry, and evolution. Cross-analysis explored correlations between verbal descriptors (pain, heaviness, swelling, injustice, shame, sensitivity) and clinical stage or subtype. Results Preliminary findings from revealed recurrent lexical fields expressing bodily dysmorphia, hyperalgesia, and emotional distress. Distinct linguistic patterns emerged according to semiological criteria: patients with stage II–III lipedema frequently used affective and metaphorical language (“weight anchored in my legs”), whereas earlier stages emphasized mechanical sensations (“tension,” “tightness”). A strong convergence was observed between the richness of expressive language and subjective pain scales. Discussion Linguistic analysis of patient verbatim provides novel insight into the semiological complexity of lipedema. Integrating qualitative linguistic descriptors into diagnostic frameworks may refine clinical classification and improve therapeutic communication. Conclusion Linguistic analysis of patient verbatim provides novel insight into the semiological complexity of lipedema. Integrating qualitative linguistic descriptors into diagnostic frameworks may refine clinical classification and improve therapeutic communication. These preliminary results suggest that the words patients use may serve as semiological markers supporting a more holistic understanding of lipedema.

Background: The aim of the study was to verify the effectiveness of a 5-week intensive protocol of multilayer bandaging alone or in combination with diet, applied to the clinical practice of lipedema. Methods: 114 women with lipedema were studied, divided into three groups: 35 women were treated with multilayer bandaging in biweekly sessions for 5 weeks, 48 were treated with the same bandaging protocol combined with an anti-inflammatory diet, and 31 women received no treatment. The effect on anthropometry, lower limb volume, pain caused by the tissue fold, and subjective symptoms were evaluated. Results: Women who completed the 5-week intensive protocol of multilayer bandaging showed a statistically significant reduction in all observed parameters: body weight, waist and hip circumference, lower limb volume, pain, and subjective symptoms. The group of women treated with multilayer bandaging and diet showed a significantly greater reduction in lower limb volume and body weight. The treatments were effective regardless of age, BMI, clinical stage, and the presence of fovea in both groups. The wearing time with the multilayer bandage had a positive correlation in the group treated with bandage in combination with diet. Conclusion: A 5week intensive protocol of multilayer bandaging of the lower limbs is an effective treatment for reducing the symptoms and clinical signs of lipedema at all stages of the disease, even in the absence of edema. Adding nutritional therapy during the bandaging cycle increases the effectiveness of the treatment on the volume of the affected extremities and body weight.

Lipoedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder mainly affecting women with excess subcutaneous fat deposition on the lower limbs, associated with pain and tenderness. There is often a family history of lipoedema, suggesting a genetic origin, but the contribution of genetics is not well studied. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for this disorder in a clinically ascertained cohort from Spain and performed a meta-analysis with the UK lipoedema cohort GWAS. We then used the results of this study as a replication of the inferred UK Biobank “lipoedema phenotype” study. Whilst our meta-analysis alone did not identify any genome-wide significant associations, our clinical cohorts provide support for three loci identified through the UKBB study: the chr2q24.3 GRB14-COBLL1 locus (rs6753142, PMETA=1.64x10-6), chr6p21.1 VEGFA locus (rs4711750, PMETA=8.99x10-7) and the chr5q11.2 ANKRD55-MAP3K1 locus (rs3936510, PMETA=1.67x10-5). We identify numerous rare SNPs with strong association signals in our meta-analysis (P<1x10-6) with support in both UK and Spanish datasets, three of which also show nominal support in the UKBB (P<0.05). These findings provide a starting point towards understanding the genetic basis of clinical lipoedema and demonstrate the utility of the interplay of large-scale biobanks genetic data and clinically ascertained cohorts to elucidate the genetic architecture of lipoedema.

Background: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder predominantly affecting women and is frequently misclassified as obesity. While its physical manifestations are increasingly recognized, less attention has been paid to eating attitudes and psychological well-being in this population. The objective of this study was to descriptively explore eating attitudes and psychological well-being in women with lipedema.Methods:This exploratory cross-sectional study used an anonymous online survey to describe eating attitudes and psychological well-being in women with lipedema. A total of 47 participants completed the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) and the World Health Organization-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize screening indicators of disordered eating risk and reduced psychological well-being.Results:Approximately two-thirds of participants scored at or above the EAT-26 screening cut-off, reflecting elevated screening indicators of disordered eating risk. When behavioral risk indicators were included, over 70% screened positive according to EAT-26 criteria. Reduced psychological well-being (as indicated by a WHO-5 score of ≤50) was observed in about one-fifth of the sample.Conclusion:In this exploratory sample of women with lipedema, elevated screening indicators of disordered eating risk and reduced psychological well-being were commonly observed. These findings offer preliminary insights suggesting that eating-related risk and reduced well-being may be prevalent in this population. Further research using larger, clinically verified samples is needed to better understand the psychological aspects of lipedema.

Lipoedema is a chronic disorder primarily affecting women. Often mistaken for obesity due to its characteristic build-up of fat cells in the legs and sometimes arms, lipoedema leaves women vulnerable to social stigma. This study investigated the role of fears of compassion and depressive symptoms in the context of weight stigma and internal weight bias in women with lipoedema.

Background Lipedema is characterized by disproportionate gluteofemoral adiposity with anti-inflammatory properties. We hypothesized that this phenotype may confer immunological protection against T-helper 1 (Th1)-mediated autoimmunity ("Immunological Shield Hypothesis"). Objective The objective of this study is to explore whether women with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-defined lipedema-like phenotype, characterized by disproportionate gluteofemoral fat accumulation, exhibit distinct immunometabolic profiles and lower prevalence of celiac disease (CD) autoimmunity in a nationally representative sample. Methods The cross-sectional analysis included 3,833 women from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2014. Celiac disease (n=11, 0.56% weighted prevalence) was defined by strict serology (tissue transglutaminase {tTG}-IgA+/endomysial antibody {EMA}-IgA+); lipedema phenotype was defined as leg-to-trunk fat ratio of >90th percentile via DXA. Results Women with celiac disease exhibited 7.4% lower gynoid fat (39.5% versus 42.6%, p=0.0007), persisting in overweight/obese strata. Conversely, the lipedema phenotype demonstrated superior metabolic health: 44.2% lower homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (p<0.001) and 7.6% lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p=0.012). Conclusions This exploratory population-based analysis identifies phenotypic divergence in fat distribution between the DXA-defined lipedema phenotype and celiac disease autoimmunity, yielding observations consistent with, but not confirmatory of, the "Immunological Shield Hypothesis." While limited by the small number of celiac cases (n=11), a sample size insufficient to detect prevalence differences for a ~7%-9% phenotype, for which approximately 225-600 celiac cases would be required, the observed differences in gynoid adiposity (7.4% reduction, p=0.0007) and the favorable metabolic profile of the lipedema phenotype (44.2% lower HOMA-IR and 7.6% lower NLR) suggest biological plausibility warranting validation in larger, targeted cohorts. These findings motivate targeted studies to evaluate whether dietary exposures, including gluten-related immune activation, interact with gluteofemoral adipose biology in lipedema.

Thieme E-Books & E-Journals

Lipedema is a multifactorial disorder with a negative evolutionary trend, influenced by genetic, hormonal, metabolic, and vascular factors that are not fully understood. Inflammation is a typical feature of lipedema and can be managed by limiting glycemic spikes. Herein, we report the case of a patient diagnosed with lipedema who followed a ketogenic diet (KD) for 6 months, resulting in a weight loss of 12 kg. Afterward, she transitioned to a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet for an additional 6 months, maintaining the good results achieved in terms of quality of life (QoL) improvement, weight control, and pain management. The patient regularly engaged in resistance training, which preserved and improved muscle mass. The primary and new outcome was due to the introduction of the second phase of the nutritional plan, specifically the low-carbohydrate diet, which could be an innovative approach. Often, diets that contain standard amounts of carbohydrates do not yield appreciable results.

Background:  Lipedema is a progressive subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder predominantly affecting women. Characterized by painful nodules and inflammation, it impairs mobility and quality of life. Traditional nonsurgical treatments currently offer limited relief and necessitate additional interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SMiLE (Softening, Mobilization, Liposuction, Extraction), a lipedema reduction surgery (LRS) technique. This technique combines lymphatic-sparing liposuction with manual lipedema extraction to comprehensively remove lipedema nodules. Methods:  Sixty-two women who underwent LRS with the SMiLE technique by the primary author participated in the study and completed an online survey. Data were collected on prior medical history related to lipedema development and comorbidities and outcome measures such as pain, activities of daily living, and quality of life before and after surgery. Results:  The findings demonstrate significant improvements in patients’ daily lives following surgery. Pain levels decreased by an average of 73.9%, with the most notable reduction in the buttock shelf (81.3%). Mobility improved for 93% of participants who had faced challenges before LRS, and quality-of-life assessments indicated a 47.5% reduction in the negative impact of lipedema postsurgery. Conclusions:  The SMiLE technique offers an advancement in the surgical management of lipedema by enabling the effective removal of lipedema tissue. Alongside a reduction in pain and improvement in mobility, this method addresses physical and psychological burdens. This study suggested that the SMiLE technique could be considered an option as part of a comprehensive approach to treating patients with lipedema.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with lipedema who presented to our outpatient clinic in Çorum, thereby contributing to defining the lipedema case profile in our country. Material and Methods: We included 80 female patients diagnosed with lipedema at the physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic of our hospital between January 2020-July 2023. Data on age, body mass index (BMI), lipedema type-stage, and symptoms were collected from medical records. Laboratory evaluations, including hemogram, 25-OH vitamin D, vitamin B12, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lower limb venous doppler ultrasound results were also obtained from medical records. Results: The mean age was 46.46±9.72 years and BMI was 32.12±4.84. Type 2 lipedema was the most common, followed by Type 1 and Type 3. Stage 2 lipedema was seen in 63.8% of the patients, stage 1 in 21.2%, and stage 3 in 15%. Common symptoms included pain, swelling, fatigue, and leg heaviness. The mean CRP was 4.88±2.89 mg/L, ESR was 18.58±10.06 mm/h, 25-OH vitamin D was 18.73±12.95 ng/dl, and vitamin B12 was 359.74±155.12 pg/ml. Venous insufficiency was present in 50% of the patients. Lipedema stage showed significant positive correlations with age (r: 0.284, p: 0.011), BMI (r: 0.307, p: 0.006), and ESR (r: 0.271, p: 0.015).Conclusion: Patients presenting with swelling and pain in the lower limbs should always be assessed for lipedema, and it should also be considered that venous insufficiency and vitamin deficiencies may coexist in these patients.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder with disproportionate fat accumulation in the extremities and is often misdiagnosed as obesity. Although women with lipedema appear to be metabolically distinct from body mass index (BMI)-matched controls, their fasting metabolism remains insufficiently characterized. We therefore aimed to define the metabolic signature of lipedema using serum NMR metabolomics and anthropometric profiling. METHODS: We conducted a study with 24 premenopausal women with lipedema and 21 BMI-matched controls. Fasting serum samples were analyzed using NMR spectroscopy and anthropometric data were collected. Regional body composition was additionally assessed in an exploratory matched DXA subset (n=12). To characterize coordinated metabolic differences beyond single analytes, we derived exploratory composite indices and applied multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Despite similar BMI, women with lipedema showed lower waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and lower fasting insulin than controls (age-adjusted p = 0.032). NMR profiling revealed lower alanine (p < 0.001), lactate (p = 0.004), pyruvate (p = 0.021), and elevated ketone bodies (3-hydroxybutyric acid: p = 0.009; acetoacetic acid: p = 0.035; acetone: p = 0.006). These alterations were reflected by significant group differences in composite indices for fat distribution (g = 1.26; p < 0.001), glycolysis (g = 0.74; p = 0.018), and ketone metabolism (g = 0.70; p = 0.018). Principal component analysis of the selected indices explained 78% of the total variance and showed partial group separation between lipedema and controls. CONCLUSION: Lipedema is associated with a distinct fasting metabolic profile characterized by reduced glycolytic intermediates, enhanced ketone body signals, and a more peripheral fat distribution despite comparable BMI. These findings support the concept of lipedema as a metabolically distinct phenotype and suggest that multivariate metabolic signatures may help refine future diagnostic and interventional approaches.