Your search

Lipedema is a lipodystrophic disease characterized primarily by a disproportionate increase in lower body subcutaneous fat. Although moderate weight loss decreases lower body fat mass in women with obesity and lipedema, it is possible that this decrease is due to a reduction in normal subcutaneous fat, rather than lipedema-affected fat. We evaluated the effect of moderate (11%) diet-induced weight loss on body fat mass and distribution, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging, in a 56-year-old woman with lipedema who was normal weight (body mass index: 23.9 kg/m2) at baseline. Approximately 85% of the decrease in body weight comprised body fat. The relative reduction in upper body fat (abdominal subcutaneous, arm and trunk fat) was similar to the relative reduction in lower body (total leg fat and thigh subcutaneous fat). Accordingly, weight loss did not change the proportion of total body fat comprising leg fat (44.8% and 45.1% before and after weight loss, respectively) or arm fat (9.1% and 9.6% before and after weight loss, respectively). These data suggest weight loss decreases lipedema-affected adipose tissue and demonstrate the therapeutic effect of weight loss on body composition in women with lipedema even if they are normal weight.

Lipedema is a chronic, progressive adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate subcutaneous fat accumulation, pain, edema, and resistanc...

Background Lipedema is characterized by disproportionate gluteofemoral adiposity with anti-inflammatory properties. We hypothesized that this phenotype may confer immunological protection against T-helper 1 (Th1)-mediated autoimmunity ("Immunological Shield Hypothesis"). Objective The objective of this study is to explore whether women with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-defined lipedema-like phenotype, characterized by disproportionate gluteofemoral fat accumulation, exhibit distinct immunometabolic profiles and lower prevalence of celiac disease (CD) autoimmunity in a nationally representative sample. Methods The cross-sectional analysis included 3,833 women from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2014. Celiac disease (n=11, 0.56% weighted prevalence) was defined by strict serology (tissue transglutaminase {tTG}-IgA+/endomysial antibody {EMA}-IgA+); lipedema phenotype was defined as leg-to-trunk fat ratio of >90th percentile via DXA. Results Women with celiac disease exhibited 7.4% lower gynoid fat (39.5% versus 42.6%, p=0.0007), persisting in overweight/obese strata. Conversely, the lipedema phenotype demonstrated superior metabolic health: 44.2% lower homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (p<0.001) and 7.6% lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p=0.012). Conclusions This exploratory population-based analysis identifies phenotypic divergence in fat distribution between the DXA-defined lipedema phenotype and celiac disease autoimmunity, yielding observations consistent with, but not confirmatory of, the "Immunological Shield Hypothesis." While limited by the small number of celiac cases (n=11), a sample size insufficient to detect prevalence differences for a ~7%-9% phenotype, for which approximately 225-600 celiac cases would be required, the observed differences in gynoid adiposity (7.4% reduction, p=0.0007) and the favorable metabolic profile of the lipedema phenotype (44.2% lower HOMA-IR and 7.6% lower NLR) suggest biological plausibility warranting validation in larger, targeted cohorts. These findings motivate targeted studies to evaluate whether dietary exposures, including gluten-related immune activation, interact with gluteofemoral adipose biology in lipedema.

Background: Lymphedema is a debilitating condition with high morbidity, yet despite advances in management, diagnostic ambiguity and fragmented referr...

Lipoedema is a chronic disorder primarily affecting women. Often mistaken for obesity due to its characteristic build-up of fat cells in the legs and sometimes arms, lipoedema leaves women vulnerable to social stigma. This study investigated the role of fears of compassion and depressive symptoms in the context of weight stigma and internal weight bias in women with lipoedema.

BACKGROUND: lipedema is a chronic, progressive adipose disorder predominantly affecting women, characterized by painful, symmetrical subcutaneous fat accumulation, and typically resistant to lifestyle interventions. The pathophysiology of advanced-stage lipedema remains poorly defined, and no validated biomarkers or targeted therapies are currently available. METHODS: in this observational study, we applied a comprehensive multi-omics approach to dissect the molecular and metabolic alterations underlying late-stage lipedema. RESULTS: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling identified over 5,000 differentially methylated CpG sites affecting genes involved in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, phospho-metabolism, and immune pathways. Transcriptomic analysis revealed profound downregulation of mitochondrial functions, including oxidative phosphorylation, the TCA cycle, and fatty acid β-oxidation, alongside disruption of the sirtuin pathway and extracellular matrix remodeling. Integrative analysis pinpointed AKT1 as a central regulatory node: its promoter region was hypomethylated, correlating with increased gene expression and protein phosphorylation. Metabolomic profiling confirmed AKT1-linked metabolic dysregulation, including altered levels of L-arginine, NADP+, ATP, guanosine, glycerol, and glutamate, indicating impaired redox balance and energy metabolism. Trans-omic network analysis positioned AKT1 at the intersection of multiple dysregulated pathways, suggesting its key role in advanced-stage lipedema. CONCLUSIONS: the consistent enhancing of AKT pathway signaling across omic layers highlights its potential not only as a biomarker for disease stratification but also as a putative druggable target for therapeutic intervention. These findings offer new mechanistic insights into lipedema pathophysiology and provide a rationale for future personalized treatment strategies guided by AKT1-centric molecular profiling.

Background Lipedema is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal fat accumulation, primarily in the lower extremities, affecting mostly women. Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, lipedema is often misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. Patients with obesity and lipedema propose a distinct clinical challenge in treating both diseases. Improved recognition and understanding are necessary to enhance diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Purpose of this Review Lipedema is thought to be hormonally driven, often manifesting during puberty, pregnancy, or menopause. It presents as disproportionate fat accumulation in the lower body, often with microvascular changes. Misdiagnosis as obesity or lymphedema leads to ineffective treatments like weight loss programs and bariatric surgery. Effective management involves both conservative and surgical approaches, as well as a tailored strategy for patients with both lipedema and obesity. The focus of this review is to summarize the current literature addressing adequate treatment regimens for patients with both diseases and based on the literature we propose a treatment protocol. Conclusion Patients with concurrent lipedema and obesity propose a distinct clinical challenge, in which early recognition can benefit adequate treatment. A combination of conservative measures and surgical options, particularly liposuction and / or bariatric and metabolic surgery, can be beneficial in treating patients with both diseases. However future research is needed to assess the effect of different treat regimens.

Lipedema is a chronic disease characterized by the symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue in the lower body, primarily affecting women. Despite being recognized for over 85 years, the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of lipedema remain complex and not fully understood. This review consolidates current knowledge, emphasizing histological, genetic, and hormonal factors, alongside diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Histological studies highlight changes such as adipocyte hypertrophy, increased fibrosis, and vascular alterations like angiogenesis. Genetic studies suggest a strong familial component, with multiple loci potentially influencing disease onset, yet the condition remains polygenic and influenced by environmental factors. Hormonal influences, particularly estrogen, play a significant role in disease pathogenesis. Diagnostic imaging techniques like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide valuable insights but are not definitive. Therapeutic strategies, including diet, weight loss, and Complex Decongestive Therapy, offer symptom management but are not curative, with liposuction considered for severe cases where conservative methods fail. The condition's complexity stems from genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences, necessitating further research to improve diagnostic and treatment strategies. Integrating genetic and hormonal insights into clinical practice could enhance patient outcomes and quality of life, highlighting the need for continued exploration and understanding of lipedema.

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that lipedema may share hormonal, inflammatory, and genetic mechanisms with gynecologic diseases, particularly endometriosis. However, the extent and nature of these interrelationships remain poorly characterized, supporting the need for this scoping review. Objectives: To map and synthesize the available evidence on the clinical, pathophysiological, and epidemiological interrelationships between lipedema in women, endometriosis, and other gynecologic diseases. Methods: Searches were conducted in international and regional health databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, LILACS/VHL, APA PsycInfo, SciELO, Epistemonikos, and La Referencia, as well as grey literature sources and relevant institutional websites. There were no language restrictions. The search period began in 1940, the year in which lipedema was first described by Allen and Hines. Study selection followed a two-stage process conducted independently by two reviewers, consisting of title and abstract screening followed by full-text review. Data extraction was performed using a pre-developed and peer-reviewed instrument covering participants, concept, context, study methods, and main findings. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework. Results: Twenty-five studies from ten countries were included. Synthesized evidence supports the characterization of lipedema as a systemic condition with metabolic and hormonal dimensions. Key findings include symptom onset linked to reproductive milestones, a high frequency of gynecologic and endocrine comorbidities, and molecular features overlapping with steroid-dependent pathologies. These patterns reflect a recent shift from a predominantly lymphovascular paradigm toward a more integrated endocrinometabolic framework. Conclusions: The findings indicate that lipedema clusters with hormone-sensitive gynecologic and endocrine features across reproductive life stages.

Background. Lipedema is a chronic and progressive fat disorder that affects ~11% of the female population. It is characterized by bilateral, disproportionate accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue predominantly in the lower body. Symptoms include pain, bruising, swelling, and subcutaneous nodules that are resistant to traditional interventions such as diet and exercise. Aim. The objective of this review is to summarize recent evidence on the characteristics, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of lipedema. Matherial and Methods. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database. The inclusion criteria were “full free text” and English scientific articles, published between 2015 and 2025. A total of 74 records were found, of which    publications were ultimately included in the review. Results. Awareness of lipedema in the medical field is increasing, but its differential diagnosis still remains a challenge. Lipedema is often unrecognized or misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. Conclusion. This narrative review provides a deeper understanding of lipedema as a serious condition, discusses its pathophysiology and treatment options. The data reveal advances in knowledge, particularly in conservative and surgical treatment with a focus on improving quality of life. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence confirming the safety and efficacy of various treatment methods. Further research is required to ensure the safety and increase the efficacy of treatment for this complex condition known as lipedema.

Background:  Lipedema is a progressive subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder predominantly affecting women. Characterized by painful nodules and inflammation, it impairs mobility and quality of life. Traditional nonsurgical treatments currently offer limited relief and necessitate additional interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SMiLE (Softening, Mobilization, Liposuction, Extraction), a lipedema reduction surgery (LRS) technique. This technique combines lymphatic-sparing liposuction with manual lipedema extraction to comprehensively remove lipedema nodules. Methods:  Sixty-two women who underwent LRS with the SMiLE technique by the primary author participated in the study and completed an online survey. Data were collected on prior medical history related to lipedema development and comorbidities and outcome measures such as pain, activities of daily living, and quality of life before and after surgery. Results:  The findings demonstrate significant improvements in patients’ daily lives following surgery. Pain levels decreased by an average of 73.9%, with the most notable reduction in the buttock shelf (81.3%). Mobility improved for 93% of participants who had faced challenges before LRS, and quality-of-life assessments indicated a 47.5% reduction in the negative impact of lipedema postsurgery. Conclusions:  The SMiLE technique offers an advancement in the surgical management of lipedema by enabling the effective removal of lipedema tissue. Alongside a reduction in pain and improvement in mobility, this method addresses physical and psychological burdens. This study suggested that the SMiLE technique could be considered an option as part of a comprehensive approach to treating patients with lipedema.

Review Article Background: Lipedema and advanced lymphedema are chronic disorders of adipose and lymphatic tissues that remain frequently underdiagnosed. Their coexistence poses therapeutic challenges, particularly when conservative management fails. Although international guidelines support surgical intervention in selected cases, real-world data from resourcelimited hospital settings remain scarce. Objective: To report the experience of a Moroccan tertiary university hospital in the surgical management of advanced lipedema and lymphedema and to compare clinical outcomes with current international recommendations. Methods: A retrospective descriptive case series was conducted between 2021 and 2024. Three patients underwent surgical treatment using tumescent liposuction or en bloc tissue resection with skin grafting. Postoperative outcomes were assessed clinically and through a structured quality-of-life questionnaire inspired by the SF-36, focusing on pain, mobility, and overall satisfaction. Results: All procedures were completed without intraoperative or postoperative complications. The volume of aspirated adipose tissue ranged from 2.1 to 4.0 L. One patient with advanced secondary lymphedema required surgical resection, with evacuation of 1.2 L of lymphorrhea. Postoperative satisfaction ranged from moderate to high, with reported quality-of-life scores between 5 and 8 out of 10. These findings are consistent with outcomes reported in recent international series. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of advanced lipedema and lymphedema is feasible, safe, and clinically beneficial, even in resource-limited settings. An individualized, guideline-based approach allows satisfactory functional and quality-of-life outcomes. Further prospective studies with standardized assessment tools are required.