Your search

PURPOSE: Individuals with lipoedema may experience negative impacts that are not often identified through current quality-of-life measures. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of individuals living with pre-existing lipoedema and their perceptions of how these experiences influence quality of life. METHODS: Participants with a prior diagnosis of lipoedema participated in a single semi-structured interview or focus group. These interviews/focus groups were transcribed verbatim, allowing for an inductive thematic analysis to be conducted. RESULTS: Sixteen participants were included and four main themes were identified. These included: the ongoing work of living with lipoedema, living with a restrictive and overwhelming condition, caught between self-acceptance and social judgement, and forced to navigate lipoedema alone. Across the four themes, 21 sub-themes emerged to convey the quality-of-life concerns experienced by individuals with lipoedema. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals living with lipoedema experience impacts on their quality-of-life across physical, psychological, and social aspects of life. This study highlights how the ongoing burden of physical symptoms, social perceptions, and healthcare-related challenges contributes to reduced quality-of-life for individuals living with lipoedema. Increased knowledge and awareness amongst healthcare providers is needed to improve care received by individuals living with this condition.

RATIONALE: To evaluate which factors are associated with change in lymphedema-specific quality of life (QoL) and relative volume difference in the maintenance phase after a multidisciplinary intensive treatment program in patients with lower limb lymphedema(LLL). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, patients received a multidisciplinary intensive treatment followed by a maintenance phase. In this maintenance phase, patients were advised to perform skin care and exercises and to wear compression garments. Circumferential measurements and the Lymph-ICF-LL questionnaires to determine volume and the lymphedema-specific QoL, respectively, were collected at the start and end of the intensive treatment and at 6 months follow-up. Patient-, lymphedema-, and treatment-related variables were collected to investigate their association with change in lymphedema-specific QoL and relative volume in the maintenance phase. Mann-Whitney U and Spearman rank correlation tests were applied. Patients (n = 279) who did not receive physiotherapy between 5 and 6 months follow-up and had a lower %score on the 6-minute walk test at the start of the intensive treatment showed significant better improvement in physical function and general tasks/household in the maintenance phase, respectively. Younger age, concomitant lipedema, and a lower % volume reduction during intensive treatment were significantly associated with less relative volume increase in the maintenance phase. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without physiotherapy around 5-6 months follow-up or with limited physical capacity at the start may perceive better improvements in certain lymphedema-specific QoL domains, while younger age, concomitant lipedema, and less initial volume reduction appear to be less predisposed to volume regain during the maintenance phase.

ObjectivesLipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by disproportionate fat accumulation, lower extremity pain, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Although pain is a cardinal symptom, its underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to characterize sensitization-related pain phenotypes in women with lipedema by examining central sensitization (CS) and neuropathic -like pain features and their associations with lower extremity function, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).MethodsIn this cross-sectional case-control study, 54 women with clinically diagnosed lipedema and 48 age-matched control participants were enrolled between March and October 2025. Pain phenotypes were assessed using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and Pain-DETECT questionnaire. Lower extremity function, sleep quality, and HRQoL were evaluated using Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS), and EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L), respectively.ResultsWomen with lipedema had significantly higher Pain-DETECT and CSI scores than controls, indicating greater neuropathic-like pain features and CS-related symptom burden (both p < .01). They also demonstrated poorer lower extremity function, greater sleep disturbance, and lower HRQoL. Pain-DETECT scores were positively correlated with CSI, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance scores. In multivariable analyses, LEFS independently predicted Pain-DETECT scores (B = -0.171, p = .015), whereas anxiety independently predicted CSI scores (B = 1.980, p = .002).ConclusionsWomen with lipedema exhibit prominent sensitization-related pain phenotypes associated with functional impairment, sleep disturbances, and reduced quality of life. Identification of these pain characteristics may improve clinical assessment, patient stratification, and multidisciplinary management of lower extremity symptoms in lipedema.

BackgroundThere are no validated Norwegian disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessing quality of life (QoL) in females with lipedema, limiting evaluation of treatment effect in clinical practice and research.ObjectiveTo translate and validate a Norwegian translation of the LIPQOL questionnaire.MethodsA cross-sectional validation study was performed in 432 females with lipedema in Norway. Descriptive statistics and floor and ceiling effects were assessed. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The overall goodness of fit was evaluated using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI). Internal consistency was assessed using composite reliability from the CFA. Associations between LIPQOL subscales and RAND-12 physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) were examined using Spearman correlations.ResultsThe LIPQOL questionnaire comprises four subscales, Function, Body image, Symptoms, and Feelings. No subscales was affected by floor or ceiling effects. The unmodified CFA shows CFI = 0.929, TLI = 0.922, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.073, and RMSEA = 0.079 (90% CI: 0.073 to 0.084). All composite reliability were considered reasonable (ranged from 0.890 to 0.916). Modification indices were evaluated, and two modifications were performed between items 5 and 8, and between items 17 and 18. With modification indices, the overall structure validity showed reasonable, but not unequivocally support for the four factor structure with CFI = 0.944, and TLI = 0.938, SRMR = 0.068, and RMSEA = 0.070 (90% CI: 0.064 to 0.075). Correlation between RAND-12 and LIPQOL subscales were large. Function, Symptoms, and overall quality of life show large correlation with PCS (Spearman's rho = −0.682, Spearman's rho = −0.550, and Spearman's rho = 0.554, respectively) and the subscales feelings and overall quality of life shows large correlation with MCS from RAND-12 (Spearman's rho = −0.685 and 0.608, respectively).ConclusionInitial findings suggest that the Norwegian version of the LIPQOL is a reasonably valid instrument for assessing quality of life in females with lipedema, although the findings do not provide unequivocal support for all aspects of its measurement properties.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the frequency of probable lipedema among women with lower extremity pain (LEP) using a validated screening questionnaire and to examine its associations with neuropathic pain (NP) characteristics, functional status, psychological symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).MethodsThis prospective questionnaire-based case-control study included 133 women, comprising 68 women with LEP and 65 age-matched healthy controls. Participants were evaluated using the Lipedema Screening Questionnaire (LSQ), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), PainDETECT questionnaire, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). An LSQ score of ≥8 was classified as probable lipedema, whereas a score of ≥12 was classified as high-probability lipedema. These categories indicate screening probability rather than a confirmed clinical diagnosis of lipedema. Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and multivariable regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with LSQ and LEFS scores.ResultsWomen with LEP had significantly higher LSQ scores and a greater proportion of probable lipedema (36.8% vs 12.3%, p = .001) and high-probability lipedema (19.1% vs 3.1%, p = .003) than controls. Compared with controls, women with LEP had poorer lower extremity function, greater anxiety symptoms, more prominent NP characteristics, and lower physical and mental HRQoL scores (all p < .05). Higher LSQ scores were positively correlated with PainDETECT scores (r = 0.446, p < .001), whereas pain intensity was not significantly correlated with the evaluated clinical outcomes. In multivariable linear regression, PainDETECT score was independently associated with LSQ score (β = 0.382, p = .004). For functional status, both the SF-12 physical (β = 0.352, p = .001) and mental component scores (β = 0.362, p = .002) were independently associated with LEFS scores.ConclusionsProbable lipedema was more frequently identified by LSQ among women with LEP than among healthy controls. NP characteristics were independently associated with greater lipedema-related symptom burden, whereas lower extremity function was independently associated with both physical and mental HRQoL. These findings support the use of lipedema and NP screening as complementary components of the clinical assessment of women with LEP. However, LSQ findings should not be interpreted as a clinical diagnosis of lipedema and require confirmation through appropriate clinical assessment.

Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the lipedema screening questionnaire - Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Background/Objectives: Lipedema is an adipose tissue disorder associated with body-related burden. This study compared orthorexic eating tendencies between women with and without lipedema and examined associations with body-shape concern and psychological symptoms. Methods: This controlled cross-sectional study included 44 women with lipedema and 44 women without lipedema. Participants completed the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS), Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Associated variables were examined using multiple linear regression. Results: Women with lipedema had higher DOS scores than women without lipedema (25.07 ± 6.55 vs. 20.48 ± 5.05; Cohen's d = 0.79; p < 0.001). BSQ, HADS-Anxiety, and HADS-Depression scores were also higher in the lipedema group (all p ≤ 0.001). DOS and BSQ scores were positively correlated in both groups. In the multivariable model, which included group status, age, BMI, BSQ, HADS-A, and HADS-D scores, BSQ score was independently associated with DOS score (B = 0.067; 95% CI 0.025-0.108; p = 0.002), whereas group status and the other covariates were not. The model's adjusted R2 was 0.234. Conclusions: Women with lipedema exhibited greater orthorexic eating tendencies, body-shape concern, and psychological symptoms than controls. Body-shape concern was independently associated with orthorexic eating tendencies. The group difference in DOS scores is largely explained by the higher BSQ scores accompanying lipedema; this should not be interpreted as indicating that lipedema is unrelated to orthorexic tendencies. These findings support consideration of body image when addressing eating behavior in lipedema care.

Lipedema is a chronic disorder of subcutaneous adipose tissue characterized by symmetrical fat accumulation of the extremities and resistance to conventional weight loss. Therapeutic options remain limited, and clinical data on nutritional interventions are scarce. A 37-year-old woman with stage II lipedema underwent a ten-day medically supervised fasting program embedded in a multimodal intervention that also included physical activity after limited response to standard conservative management. Body weight decreased from 78.7 to 73.7kg, and C-reactive protein from 22.5 to 0.82mg/L. Limb circumferences decreased at the calves (48 to 44–44.5cm) and thighs (65 to 58cm). Subcutaneous tissue thickness, measured by ultrasound, decreased at the medial malleolus (22 to 12–15mm) and at the mid-thigh (44 to 34.5mm), while remaining stable in the gluteal region (98mm). Elastography showed a persistent heterogeneous fibrosclerotic pattern. The patient reported a marked reduction in pain (approximately 80% during fasting, sustained at ~50% for over one month). No adverse events occurred. Altogether, this case is notable because objective ultrasound measurements and inflammatory biomarkers improved after a structured fasting intervention in a condition usually considered resistant to weight loss. Because the intervention was multimodal, the contribution of fasting cannot be isolated and controlled studies are warranted. This suggests that medically supervised fasting may improve inflammatory status and tissue structure in lipedema and warrants further investigation in controlled studies.

The aim of this study was to compare serum adiponectin, leptin, resistin, irisin, and galectin-3 levels between patients with lipedema and healthy controls, and to examine their relationship with subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness.

Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder characterized by pain and disproportionate fat distribution. Although exercise is an important component of lipedema management, evidence regarding exercise behavior, physical activity, and related barriers remains limited. This study aimed to investigate exercise behavior, physical activity level, and perceived barriers in women with lipedema compared to healthy controls.

Background: The clinical course of lipedema in women receiving hormonal treatment for concomitant estrogen-dependent gynecological disorders remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to describe gynecological and lipedema-related manifestations during routine follow-up in women receiving subcutaneous gestrinone implants for gynecological indications. Methods: This retrospective, descriptive case series included 50 women with stage II or III lipedema and concomitant estrogen-dependent gynecological disorders treated between May 2024 and May 2025 at a specialized multidisciplinary outpatient clinic in São Paulo, Brazil. Participants received two biodegradable subcutaneous gestrinone implants (35 mg and 50 mg; total dose: 85 mg) exclusively for gynecological indications. Clinical outcomes were extracted retrospectively from medical records and analyzed descriptively. Improvement proportions were calculated using the number of patients presenting each manifestation at baseline as the denominator. Outcomes were based on patient reports and qualitative clinical assessments without standardized instruments. Results: Among gynecological manifestations, improvement was documented in 43 of 50 patients with menstrual pain (86%), six of 13 with menorrhagia (46.2%), and two of 50 with premenstrual symptoms (4%). Among lipedema-related manifestations, improvement was documented in 35 of 39 patients with edema (89.7%) and 33 of 41 with spontaneous pain (80.5%). Qualitative improvement in skin appearance and clinically assessed tissue fibrosis was documented in 31 of 50 (62%) and 28 of 50 (56%) patients, respectively. Overall clinical status was reported as improved by 42 patients (84%), stable by six (12%), and worsened by two (4%). Conclusions: Improvements in pain and edema, alongside qualitative changes in skin appearance and clinically assessed tissue fibrosis, were documented during routine follow-up. Given the retrospective design, absence of a comparison group, and nonstandardized assessments, these observations cannot be attributed to gestrinone or interpreted as evidence of its efficacy for lipedema. Prospective controlled studies using standardized outcome measures are warranted.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacies of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and complex decongestive therapy (CDT) in patients with lipedema. DESIGN: This randomized-controlled-study included 33 patients with lipedema, with 11 patients in each of the three groups. The first group received ESWT alone, the second group received CDT alone, and the third group received ESWT followed by CDT within the session for six treatment sessions. Assessments were performed at baseline and two weeks after treatment completion. Outcome measures included total and lower extremity fat mass assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, lower extremity volume, body mass index, pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and quality of life. RESULTS: Total and lower extremity fat mass decreased significantly only in the ESWT and ESWT+CDT groups (P<0.05), although the magnitude of improvement was small and not superior to that of CDT alone (P>0.05). Additionally, all three groups showed significant improvements in lower extremity volume, pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and quality of life (P<0.05), with no significant differences between the groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: All three treatment approaches are safe and feasible options for the management of lipedema. Considering its low cost, accessibility, and ease of application, ESWT may be preferred over the other treatment modalities.

A previously healthy 35-year-old woman developed recurrent syncope and dyspnoea two days after extensive thigh liposuction for lipedema. CT pulmonary angiography revealed a large saddle embolus with peripheral emboli. Fat embolism was initially suspected; however, imaging findings and laboratory parameters supported a thromboembolic origin. Treatment with anticoagulation was complicated by postoperative bleeding. This case report highlights the importance of considering both fat embolism and thromboembolic pulmonary embolism after liposuction.

To comprehensively characterize pain in women with lipedema and evaluate its relationship with central sensitization, neuropathic pain characteristics, pain sensitivity, sleep quality, and quality of life.: A cross-sectional controlled study.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital.59 women with Type 2–3, Stage 1–3 lipedema and 59 age-matched healthy controls.Pain intensity, neuropathic pain characteristics, symptoms related to central sensitization, pain catastrophizing, sleep quality, health-related quality of life, and pressure pain thresholds were assessed using validated questionnaires and pressure algometry.Compared with healthy controls, women with lipedema had significantly higher pain intensity, painDETECT, Central Sensitization Inventory, pain catastrophizing, and sleep disturbance scores, whereas pressure pain thresholds and all Short Form-36 domain scores were significantly lower (all p &lt; 0.001). Clinically significant symptoms related to central sensitization (Central Sensitization Inventory ≥40) were present in 78.0% of patients versus 8.5% of controls. These associations remained significant after adjustment for age and body mass index. Although pain intensity, painDETECT scores, and pressure pain thresholds were associated with disease stage, Central Sensitization Inventory scores were not.Pain in lipedema extends beyond local adipose tissue changes and is associated with widespread pain sensitivity, symptoms related to central sensitization, impaired sleep, pain catastrophizing, and reduced quality of life. These findings support a multidimensional approach to pain assessment in lipedema.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic adipose tissue disorder that may involve the upper extremities, particularly in advanced disease stages, leading to pain, heaviness, and functional complaints. While liposuction is an established treatment for symptom relief and volume reduction, its impact on objective upper-limb function-especially shoulder mobility-has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in female patients with upper-extremity lipedema undergoing circumferential arm liposuction. Active shoulder range of motion (ROM), including abduction, flexion, and external rotation, was assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using standardized digital goniometry. Upper-limb disability (QuickDASH), pain, perceived heaviness, and upper-arm circumference were also recorded. Outcomes were analyzed over time and stratified by lipedema stage. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients completed the 6-month primary follow-up. Mean active shoulder abduction improved significantly from 132.4° ± 13.8° at baseline to 154.7° ± 11.5° at 6 months and remained stable at 12 months (p < 0.001). Composite shoulder ROM demonstrated a similar progressive improvement. Patients with Stage II and III lipedema exhibited greater absolute functional gains, achieving postoperative ROM values comparable to those observed in earlier stages. QuickDASH scores, pain, and perceived heaviness decreased significantly over time (p < 0.001). Upper-arm circumference reduction correlated moderately with improvements in shoulder abduction (r = 0.42, p < 0.01). Measurement reliability was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Upper-extremity liposuction for lipedema is associated with significant and durable improvements in shoulder mobility and upper-limb function. Beyond symptom relief and contour improvement, surgical debulking appears to restore functional movement, supporting the concept of upper-extremity lipedema as a functional disorder. Objective assessment of shoulder mobility should be considered an important outcome measure in the surgical evaluation of lipedema. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Lipedema is a chronic, progressive, and often underdiagnosed disease characterized by the pathological, bilateral, and symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue. This distribution results in disproportionate and painful swelling of the limbs. Typically extending distally from the hips, this predominantly female condition is frequently misidentified as lifestyle-induced obesity or bilateral lymphedema. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of structural and functional abnormalities in myocardial dimensions, mechanics, valves, and major arteries in patients with lipedema. According to the existing literature, left atrial enlargement, left ventricular rotational abnormalities, mitral annular dilation, and increased aortic stiffness have been identified in patients with lipedema. These findings suggest latent but significant alterations in left heart physiology. Although current data remain limited and are primarily focused on the left heart and the aorta, the rapid evolution of cardiac imaging technologies suggests that both clinical knowledge and the body of research in this field are poised for significant expansion.