Your search

Lipoedema is a chronic, progressive condition characterised by disproportionate fat accumulation in the lower extremities, often misdiagnosed due to symptom overlap with obesity. Weight management is a key component of lipoedema treatment, yet the role of bariatric surgery remains unclear. This systematic review evaluates the impact of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) on lipoedema symptoms, weight loss outcomes, and the need for further interventions. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to January 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting on patients with lipoedema (or equivalent diagnoses) who underwent BMS were included. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for case reports and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) tool for case series. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria (five case reports, two cohort studies), comprising 51 patients. All underwent BMS, primarily sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. One study (n = 31) reported a significant reduction in thigh volume and weight loss comparable to controls. The remaining studies found persistent or worsened lower body disproportionality and no improvement in pain. Postoperative lipoedema diagnoses were common, raising concerns over diagnostic accuracy. Overall weight loss averaged 33.9% total weight loss. Bariatric and metabolic surgery achieves meaningful weight reduction in patients with lipoedema and obesity but does not consistently improve core lipoedema symptoms. Its role remains adjunctive rather than primary. Preoperative identification and documentation of lipoedema features are recommended, with a postoperative plan for adjunct conservative therapies and selective consideration of lymph-sparing liposuction where symptoms persist. Larger prospective studies using standardised definitions and outcome measures are needed to clarify its therapeutic value in this population.

Background Lipedema is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal fat accumulation, primarily in the lower extremities, affecting mostly women. Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, lipedema is often misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. Patients with obesity and lipedema propose a distinct clinical challenge in treating both diseases. Improved recognition and understanding are necessary to enhance diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Purpose of this Review Lipedema is thought to be hormonally driven, often manifesting during puberty, pregnancy, or menopause. It presents as disproportionate fat accumulation in the lower body, often with microvascular changes. Misdiagnosis as obesity or lymphedema leads to ineffective treatments like weight loss programs and bariatric surgery. Effective management involves both conservative and surgical approaches, as well as a tailored strategy for patients with both lipedema and obesity. The focus of this review is to summarize the current literature addressing adequate treatment regimens for patients with both diseases and based on the literature we propose a treatment protocol. Conclusion Patients with concurrent lipedema and obesity propose a distinct clinical challenge, in which early recognition can benefit adequate treatment. A combination of conservative measures and surgical options, particularly liposuction and / or bariatric and metabolic surgery, can be beneficial in treating patients with both diseases. However future research is needed to assess the effect of different treat regimens.

Lipedema is a chronic disease characterized by the symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue in the lower body, primarily affecting women. Despite being recognized for over 85 years, the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of lipedema remain complex and not fully understood. This review consolidates current knowledge, emphasizing histological, genetic, and hormonal factors, alongside diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Histological studies highlight changes such as adipocyte hypertrophy, increased fibrosis, and vascular alterations like angiogenesis. Genetic studies suggest a strong familial component, with multiple loci potentially influencing disease onset, yet the condition remains polygenic and influenced by environmental factors. Hormonal influences, particularly estrogen, play a significant role in disease pathogenesis. Diagnostic imaging techniques like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide valuable insights but are not definitive. Therapeutic strategies, including diet, weight loss, and Complex Decongestive Therapy, offer symptom management but are not curative, with liposuction considered for severe cases where conservative methods fail. The condition's complexity stems from genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences, necessitating further research to improve diagnostic and treatment strategies. Integrating genetic and hormonal insights into clinical practice could enhance patient outcomes and quality of life, highlighting the need for continued exploration and understanding of lipedema.

Lipedema is a chronic and progressive disorder characterized by disproportionate fat accumulation, mainly affecting the lower extremities of women, and commonly accompanied by sensations of heaviness, tenderness, and discomfort. While its pathogenesis remains largely unknown, genetic, hormonal, and microvascular factors have been implicated. The condition often coexists with psychological distress, which significantly detracts from the quality of life of affected individuals. Diagnosis is primarily clinical, as no specific biomarkers or imaging modalities have been proven sufficiently reliable for identification. Proposed managements are controversial, although current treatment focuses on symptom management and disease control through conservative methods such as compression and non-invasive device therapies, specialized diets, and physical rehabilitation or surgical treatments. Psychological support is vital in addressing the emotional challenges of the condition. Despite recent advancements in the understanding and management of lipedema, there remains a critical need for further research to establish standardized diagnostic criteria and targeted therapeutic strategies for this debilitating condition.

Lipedema is a chronic, underdiagnosed adipose disorder marked by disproportionate fat accumulation, pain, and impaired mobility. Misdiagnosis as obesity or lymphedema delays care and increases morbidity. We systematically reviewed clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and management options (conservative and surgical). A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted in January 2025 for English-language articles published from January 1950 to January 2023 using the keywords "lipedema" or "lipoedema." Additional references were identified via manual review of relevant systematic reviews. Two independent reviewers screened studies and graded quality using a modified Oxford scale. Of 339 articles, 61 met the inclusion criteria. Most were observational cohorts, case series, or expert consensus, with few randomized trials. Conservative therapies, including ketogenic or Rare Adipose Disorders (RAD) diets, compression therapy, and aquatic exercise, were associated with reduced pain and swelling (Grade 2A-2B). Tumescent liposuction showed the strongest evidence for sustained symptom improvement, mobility, and quality of life (Grade 1 recommendation, evidence quality 2-3). Lipedema is a distinct, progressive condition requiring early recognition and intervention. Conservative therapies may provide partial relief, but tumescent liposuction remains the most effective treatment. Standardized diagnostic criteria, validated patient-reported outcomes, and clearer guidelines are needed to harmonize care and improve long-term outcomes.

Background. Lipedema is a chronic and progressive fat disorder that affects ~11% of the female population. It is characterized by bilateral, disproportionate accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue predominantly in the lower body. Symptoms include pain, bruising, swelling, and subcutaneous nodules that are resistant to traditional interventions such as diet and exercise. Aim. The objective of this review is to summarize recent evidence on the characteristics, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of lipedema. Matherial and Methods. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database. The inclusion criteria were “full free text” and English scientific articles, published between 2015 and 2025. A total of 74 records were found, of which    publications were ultimately included in the review. Results. Awareness of lipedema in the medical field is increasing, but its differential diagnosis still remains a challenge. Lipedema is often unrecognized or misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. Conclusion. This narrative review provides a deeper understanding of lipedema as a serious condition, discusses its pathophysiology and treatment options. The data reveal advances in knowledge, particularly in conservative and surgical treatment with a focus on improving quality of life. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence confirming the safety and efficacy of various treatment methods. Further research is required to ensure the safety and increase the efficacy of treatment for this complex condition known as lipedema.

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that lipedema may share hormonal, inflammatory, and genetic mechanisms with gynecologic diseases, particularly endometriosis. However, the extent and nature of these interrelationships remain poorly characterized, supporting the need for this scoping review. Objectives: To map and synthesize the available evidence on the clinical, pathophysiological, and epidemiological interrelationships between lipedema in women, endometriosis, and other gynecologic diseases. Methods: Searches were conducted in international and regional health databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, LILACS/VHL, APA PsycInfo, SciELO, Epistemonikos, and La Referencia, as well as grey literature sources and relevant institutional websites. There were no language restrictions. The search period began in 1940, the year in which lipedema was first described by Allen and Hines. Study selection followed a two-stage process conducted independently by two reviewers, consisting of title and abstract screening followed by full-text review. Data extraction was performed using a pre-developed and peer-reviewed instrument covering participants, concept, context, study methods, and main findings. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework. Results: Twenty-five studies from ten countries were included. Synthesized evidence supports the characterization of lipedema as a systemic condition with metabolic and hormonal dimensions. Key findings include symptom onset linked to reproductive milestones, a high frequency of gynecologic and endocrine comorbidities, and molecular features overlapping with steroid-dependent pathologies. These patterns reflect a recent shift from a predominantly lymphovascular paradigm toward a more integrated endocrinometabolic framework. Conclusions: The findings indicate that lipedema clusters with hormone-sensitive gynecologic and endocrine features across reproductive life stages.

Lipoedema is a chronic, progressive condition characterised by disproportionate fat accumulation in the lower extremities, often misdiagnosed due to symptom overlap with obesity. Weight management is a key component of lipoedema treatment, yet the role of bariatric surgery remains unclear. This systematic review evaluates the impact of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) on lipoedema symptoms, weight loss outcomes, and the need for further interventions.A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to January 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting on patients with lipoedema (or equivalent diagnoses) who underwent BMS were included. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for case reports and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) tool for case series.Seven studies met the inclusion criteria (five case reports, two cohort studies), comprising 51 patients. All underwent BMS, primarily sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. One study (n=31) reported a significant reduction in thigh volume and weight loss comparable to controls. The remaining studies found persistent or worsened lower body disproportionality and no improvement in pain. Postoperative lipoedema diagnoses were common, raising concerns over diagnostic accuracy. Overall weight loss averaged 33.9% total weight loss.Bariatric and metabolic surgery achieves meaningful weight reduction in lipoedema patients with obesity but does not consistently improve core lipoedema symptoms. Its role remains adjunctive rather than primary. Larger prospective studies using standardised definitions and outcome measures are needed to clarify its therapeutic value in this population.

ObjectivesLipedema is a chronic condition that predominantly affects women, leading to painful, disproportionate fat distribution in the limbs. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across multiple domains in individuals with lipedema.MethodsWe systematically reviewed studies from inception to 3 July 2025 in MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) that primarily assessed HRQoL in individuals with lipedema. Data were extracted from studies using HRQoL assessment scales. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cross-sectional studies. The review protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024590792). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to compute pooled mean HRQoL scores across various domains.ResultsFourteen cross-sectional studies involving nine countries and 3851 participants were included. The meta-analysis found significant impairments in multiple HRQoL domains: physical functioning (61.19, 95% CI: 56.77-65.60), pain (51.77, 95% CI: 45.01-58.53), social functioning (63.24, 95% CI: 58.44-68.04), emotional well-being (64.19, 95% CI: 59.86-68.52), and energy/fatigue (43.50, 95% CI: 39.32-47.68).ConclusionLipedema significantly affects HRQoL, with major deficits in physical, emotional, and social functioning. These findings highlight the need for greater clinical awareness and comprehensive management strategies, including both physical and psychological interventions, to improve the quality of life for individuals with lipedema. Further research is needed to explore long-term effects and optimize treatment approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Lipedema is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by symmetrical deposition of adipose tissue in the upper and lower limbs, disproportionate to the trunk. It primarily affects women. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of surgical treatment in patients with lipedema who are refractory to conservative management. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Retrospective studies involving patients who underwent surgical treatment after failing clinical management were included. Means and proportions were pooled using the inverse variance method and logit transformations, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: We included 6 studies comprising 429 patients, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 44 months. In this meta-analysis, surgical treatment with tumescent liposuction resulted in significant clinical improvements for patients with lipedema. The pooled mean preoperative pain score was 5.64 (95% CI: 3.67-8.69), which decreased to 1.19 (95% CI: 0.91-4.22) postoperatively. Sensitivity to touch or pressure was reduced from a preoperative mean of 5.77 (95% CI: 4.10-8.10) to 1.96 (95% CI: 1.17-3.29) after surgery. Swelling scores improved from 5.47 (95% CI: 3.73-8.02) preoperatively to 2.14 (95% CI: 1.31-3.48) postoperatively, while restriction of movement scores decreased from 3.76 (95% CI: 2.48-5.72) to 0.77 (95% CI: 0.36-1.64). CONCLUSION: The results of this single-arm meta-analysis, which included six studies and 429 patients with lipedema refractory to clinical treatment and undergoing surgical intervention, demonstrate that tumescent liposuction is associated with reductions in postoperative pain and edema, as well as improvements in cosmetic outcomes, quality of life, and mobility. The duration of follow-up was adequate to capture relevant clinical outcomes and adverse events. However, lipedema remains a condition that requires further high-quality studies to define the optimal therapeutic approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ."

Lipedema, a chronic condition primarily affecting women, is characterized by abnormal subcutaneous fat accumulation and swelling in the extremities (while sparing the hands, feet, and trunk). This disease is associated with genetic predisposition, hormonal imbalances, impaired lymphatic function, and vascular dysfunction. Lipedema does not directly cause weight gain, but excess weight can worsen symptoms and accelerate disease progression. Bariatric surgery is considered a treatment option for body weight management and reduction of subcutaneous fat; however, reported studies have indicated that this treatment cannot reduce localized fat accumulation or fat cell hypertrophy or alleviate pain symptoms. Although no proven dietary treatment currently exists, nutrition plays a key role in managing lipedema. Certain dietary approaches such as ketogenic, low-carbohydrate, and modified Mediterranean diets have been explored for weight management and inflammation reduction in lipedema, with studies showing positive effects on body composition and pain. However, according to the current literature no evidence-based nutritional treatments or nutritional supplements are effective in this patient group. Nutritional therapy in lipedema is complicated by frequent comorbidities; therefore, precision nutritional therapy should be planned by evaluating the causes and consequences of the disease. In this review, we evaluated reported studies of current evidence-based clinical nutritional approaches to lipedema treatment.

Summary: Lipedema is a chronic disease characterized by the disproportionate and symptomatic accumulation of fat in the lower limbs and arms. Women with lipedema experience heaviness, fatigue and p...

Lipedema is a chronic disorder characterized by the symmetrical accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue, predominantly affecting women. Despite increasing recognition, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying adipose tissue dysfunction in lipedema remain incompletely understood. This mini review combines current knowledge about adipose tissue biology in lipedema, highlighting recent discoveries, ongoing controversies, and future research directions. A comprehensive literature review was conducted focusing on adipose tissue-related research in lipedema with emphasis on pathophysiological mechanisms, cellular composition, and therapeutic implications. Recent studies reveal that lipedema adipose tissue exhibits distinct characteristics, including M2 macrophage predominance, stage-dependent adipocyte hypertrophy, progressive fibrosis, and altered lymphatic/vascular function. The inflammatory profile differs markedly from obesity, with an anti-inflammatory M2-like macrophage phenotype rather than the pro-inflammatory M1 response seen in classic obesity. Emerging evidence suggests lipedema may represent a model of “healthy” subcutaneous adipose tissue expansion with preserved metabolic function despite increased adiposity. Current research proposes menopause as a critical turning point, driven by estrogen receptor imbalance and intracrine estrogen excess. Lipedema represents a unique adipose tissue disorder distinct from obesity, characterized by specific cellular and molecular signatures. Current research gaps include the need for validated biomarkers, standardized diagnostic criteria, and targeted therapeutics. Future research should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms driving adipose tissue dysfunction and developing precision medicine approaches.

Lipedema is a chronic, progressive adipose tissue disorder that affects up to 10% of women and is characterized by disproportionate lower-limb fat accumulation, pain, edema, and resistance to conventional weight-loss approaches. Its pathophysiology involves a complex interplay of adipocyte hypertrophy, chronic inflammation, extracellular matrix fibrosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and sex steroid imbalance, highlighting the need for disease-modifying therapies. This narrative review synthesizes mechanistic, translational, and clinical evidence linking metabolic, inflammatory, and fibrotic pathways to lipedema and tirzepatide's potential therapeutic relevance. Tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1)/GIP (Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide) receptor agonist, has demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in obesity and diabetes, alongside pleiotropic actions on inflammation, fibrosis, and adipose remodeling. Mechanistic studies reveal favorable effects on macrophage polarization, cytokine signaling, extracellular matrix turnover, and thermogenesis, suggesting potential relevance to lipedema biology. Translational evidence from related fibro-inflammatory conditions such as steatohepatitis and heart failure further supports its antifibrotic and immunomodulatory plausibility. Although direct clinical evidence in lipedema is lacking, the convergence of mechanistic pathways provides a strong rationale to investigate tirzepatide as a disease-modifying candidate. If future clinical studies confirm these mechanisms, tirzepatide could represent a novel metabolic-hormonal therapy capable of modifying the natural course of lipedema.

Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disorder marked by the abnormal accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue, predominantly in the lower body and almost exclusively affecting women. In recent years, the off-label use of gestrinone - a synthetic steroid with androgenic, antiprogestogenic, and weak estrogenic activity, originally approved only for endometriosis - has gained attention as a potential therapy for lipedema, particularly in the form of subcutaneous implants. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of gestrinone for this indication. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and LILACS; clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC)); as well as national and international clinical guidelines and expert consensus documents published up to July 30, 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, case series, and clinical guidelines. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, with a third resolving discrepancies. The search identified nine records across all databases, registries, and other sources. After removing one duplicate, eight unique records were screened. All four records from indexed databases underwent full-text assessment. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, no studies - randomized, observational, or otherwise - were identified that evaluated the use of gestrinone for lipedema. Likewise, no ongoing clinical trials were found. Clinical guidelines and position statements from professional societies and patient associations uniformly advise against the off-label prescription of gestrinone for lipedema, citing the absence of scientific evidence. There is no scientific basis for the use of gestrinone in the management of lipedema. Healthcare providers should rely on evidence-based treatments, including compression therapy, tailored physical exercise, nutritional counseling, and psychological support and restrict hormonal interventions to ethically approved research protocols.

Knee pain in women with lipedema is frequently misattributed and undertreated. We outline a biomechanical and inflammatory cascade linking systemic adipose dysfunction, anabolic resistance, and thigh-predominant sarcopenia to dynamic knee valgus, plantar arch collapse, altered gait, patellofemoral malalignment, and ultimately chondromalacia patellae. We integrate synovial-adipose crosstalk and the high prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility as amplifiers of joint loading. This framework supports a practical, staged approach that couples symptom control with progressive, targeted strengthening and gait retraining. Rather than treating the knee in isolation, addressing the cascade may reduce pain and improve function.

This article aims to summarize contemporary understanding and management strategies of lipedema. It will elucidate recent advancements in diagnostic methodologies, the role of imaging technologies, and evolving therapeutic interventions. The article will further delineate critical areas that warrant further investigation.

Introduction: Lipedema is a chronic, progressive loose–connective-tissue disorder characterized by painful, disproportionate subcutaneous adipose tissue, functional limitations, and impaired quality of life, prompting growing interest in evidence-based management strategies. Objective: To systematically review contemporary human studies on surgical and non-surgical treatments for lipedema, with emphasis on symptom control, functional outcomes, complications, and quality of life, and to synthesize comparative effectiveness across modalities. Methods: We planned a PRISMA-compliant search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP for the last five years, expanding to ten years only if fewer than ten eligible studies were found; inclusion criteria prioritized human clinical trials and observational studies, with basic science excluded from synthesis; risk of bias and certainty of evidence (GRADE) were prespecified; data were extracted for populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and follow-up. Results and Discussion: Recent literature suggests that compression therapy, exercise, and pneumatic compression can reduce pain and edema and improve patient-reported outcomes, while liposuction techniques including tumescent, power-assisted, and water-assisted approaches generally show substantial improvements in symptoms and health-related quality of life with acceptable complication rates; however, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria, outcome measures, and follow-up limits certainty of pooled estimates. Conclusion: Contemporary evidence supports a stepped, individualized approach beginning with optimized conservative care and progressing to lipedema reduction surgery in appropriately selected patients, with shared decision-making and standardized outcome measurement essential for practice and future research.