Full bibliography

INTRODUCTION: Lipedema causes abnormal fat accumulation in the limbs, leading to pain, functional impairment, and body image disturbance. Nowadays, various liposuction techniques are available. The wet technique is increasingly being considered as the gold standard; however, comparative data between the dry and wet methods remain limited. We evaluated the efficacy of liposuction and compared outcomes between dry and wet approaches. Our analysis focused on surgical characteristics, complication rates, and clinical outcomes including pain relief, functional improvement, and esthetic satisfaction, with comparisons made between preoperative and 12-month postoperative results. METHODS: Besides surgical data extraction, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained through three different standardized questionnaires to assess pain relief, function gain, and esthetic satisfaction. RESULTS: Both techniques were effective, demonstrating overall improvements in pain, function, and body image, when comparing pre and postoperative outcomes. Lipoaspirate volumes were comparable between the groups. Operative time was significantly shorter in the wet technique group. Short-term complication rates did not differ between dry and wet techniques. While both techniques led to a global improvement, the wet technique showed greater potential in pain reduction and better esthetics satisfaction 12 months post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Lipedema is a complex disease that is still poorly understood. Liposuction may offer symptomatic relief regardless of the technique used, but the wet technique demonstrates better postoperative results, with improved PROMs and fewer complications. The treatment of lipedema requires a multidisciplinary approach, while conservative therapy remains the first-line option, surgical treatment by wet liposuction should be considered for its significant potential in improving functional outcomes and as an effective therapeutic option.